diplomsko delo
Mojca Kerin (Author), Franc Koletnik (Mentor)

Abstract

V diplomskem delu smo proučili metodiko preiskovanja prevar med gospodarskimi revizorji in metodiko preiskovanja prevar med pooblaščenimi preiskovalci in ju med seboj primerjali. Najprej smo opredelili pojem gospodarske prevare, predstavili motive zaposlencev, zaradi katerih storijo prevaro, opredelili načine odkrivanja prevar ter proučili odgovornost poslovodstva, ki jo nosi pri preprečevanju in odkrivanju prevar. V nadaljevanju smo proučili metodike dela notranjih, zunanjih in državnih revizorjev pri preiskovanju prevar. Znotraj tega smo predstavili njihovo odgovornost in strokovna pravila, ki jih morajo pri preiskovanju spoštovati ter na praktičnem primeru prikazali preiskovanje prevare notranjega revizorja in ga analizirali. V naslednjem poglavju smo proučili metodiko dela pooblaščenih preiskovalcev. V sklopu tega poglavja smo predstavili značilnosti forenzične revizije in znanja ter veščine, ki jih mora pooblaščeni preiskovalec pridobiti oziroma imeti za uspešno in učinkovito opravljanje svojega dela. Na koncu tega poglavja pa smo prav tako na praktičnem primeru prikazali preiskovanje prevare pooblaščenega preiskovalca in ga analizirali. Nazadnje pa smo proučevane metodike med seboj primerjali po teoretični in praktični plati ter med njimi poiskali bistvene razlike.

Keywords

revizija;revizor;gospodarski kriminal;vzroki;notranja kontrola;notranja revizija;zunanja revizija;metodika;metode;tveganje;podjetnik;odgovornost;poročanje;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Source: Krško
Typology: 2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization: UM EPF - Faculty of Economics and Business
Publisher: [M. Kerin]
UDC: 657.6
COBISS: 10354204 Link will open in a new window
Views: 2517
Downloads: 302
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: Auditor's and certified fraud examiners investigation methodology - a comparison)
Secondary abstract: In our work we described the methodology of investigation of fraud between auditors and certified fraud examiners and did comparision between them. At first we defined the concept of economic fraud and presented motives of employees for making frauds. We defined different fraud detection techniques and examined the responsibility of management to prevent and detect fraud. Next, we examined the methodology of internal, external and state auditors in investigating fraud. We presented their responsibility and rules, which they must follow in investigation. We also described the fraud investigation of internal auditor on a practical case. In the next chapter we examined methodology of certified fraud examiners. We presented the characteristics of forensic audits and the knowledge and skills, which a certified fraud examiner must obtain to be successful at his work. We concluded this chapter with a practical case and analisys of fraud investigation by certified fraud examiner. Finally we compared methodology in a theoretical and practical aspect and we showed the main defferences between them.
Secondary keywords: state auditor;economic fraud;examination methodology;internal control;internal auditor;certified fraud examiner;management;perpetrator;fraud risk;external auditor;external auditing;internal auditing;state auditing;
URN: URN:SI:UM:
Type (COBISS): Undergraduate thesis
Thesis comment: Univ. v Mariboru, Ekonomsko-poslovna fak.
Pages: 102 str.
Keywords (UDC): applied sciences;medicine;technology;uporabne znanosti;medicina;tehnika;communication and transport industries;accountancy;business management;public relations;komunikacije in transport;knjigovodstvo;poslovni menedžment;stiki z javnostjo;accountancy;računovodstvo;
ID: 1002812