Pravni položaj pacienta in avtonomija njegove volje

diplomsko delo

Monika Špindler (Author), Zlatko Dežman (Mentor)

Abstract

Že stoletja dolgo Hipokratova etična načela nalagajo zdravniku, da vedno in povsod ravna izključno v bolnikovo dobro. Se je pa v vseh teh stoletjih odnos med zdravnikom in bolnikom precej spremenil. Iz zaščitniškega odnosa s strani zdravnika do bolnika je prešel v partnerski odnos oziroma neke vrste zavezništvo, kjer je za uspešno zdravljenje potrebno sodelovanje med zdravnikom in bolnikom. V začetku 20-tega stoletja se je začelo uveljavljati načelo samostojnosti bolnika. Gre za samostojnost bolnika pri odločitvah glede opravljanja medicinskih posegov in predlaganega zdravljenja. S tem se je priznala avtonomnost bolnika oziroma njegova pravica, da sprejme ali odkloni predlagan medicinski poseg ali zdravljenje. Zdravnik ima dolžnost posredovati bolniku vse informacije glede predlaganih postopkov, seveda na bolniku razumljiv način. Po pogovoru se lahko bolnik s predlaganimi posegi in postopki zdravljenja strinja ali pa tudi ne. Ima vso pravico predlagane posege ali zdravljenje odkloniti. V takem primeru sta zdravnik in bolnik dolžna poiskati rešitev, s katero se oba strinjata oziroma je za oba sprejemljiva. Tako zdravnik ni več samo svetovalec ampak je postavljen tudi v vlogo pogajalca. Pravico bolnika do samostojnega odločanja oziroma avtonomnosti je treba spoštovati. Vsekakor pa je osnova za dober odnos med zdravnikom in bolnikom medsebojno spoštovanje, zaupanje, česar pa je v današnjem času vedno manj.

Keywords

medicinska etika;zdravniki;bolniki;pojasnilna dolžnost;diplomska dela;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2010
Source:	Maribor
Typology:	2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:	UM PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher:	[M. Špindler]
UDC:	34(043.2)
COBISS:	4109867
Views:	3205
Downloads:	963
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary title:	LEGAL POSITION OF THE PATIENT AND AUTONOMY OF HIS WILL
Secondary abstract:	For centuries long Hippocratic ethical principles have guided doctors to always perform their work in patient favour. But the doctor-patient relationship has changed over the past few centuries from protective to some sort of allied relationship, where success of treatment is based in cooperation between doctor and patient. In the beginning of the twentieth century the principle of patient independence emerged. This turning point recognized patients sovereignty and the right to accept or declaine proposed medical intervention. The doctor is obligated to inform the patient in understandable fashion about all the planned procedures, but the patient has the right to declaine them. So, doctors should give information about proposed intervention and treatment in order for the patient to decide wheter or not he or she wishes to undergo such treatment, but the patient has every right to declaine it. This forces both doctor and patient to search for a compromise which is acceptable for both parties and makes doctors not just advisors but also negotiators. The patient autonomy and the right to make independent decisions should be respected, but neverthless it is mutual respect and trust that makes the doctor-patient relationship the basis for everything else. And we see less and less of such modus operandi in today´s world.
Secondary keywords:	medical ethics;doctor;patient;doctor-patient relationship;obligation to inform;informed consent;patient autonomy.;
URN:	URN:SI:UM:
Type (COBISS):	Undergraduate thesis
Thesis comment:	Univ. v Mariboru, Pravna fakulteta
Pages:	70 f.
Keywords (UDC):	social sciences;družbene vede;law;jurisprudence;pravo;pravoznanstvo;
ID:	1004002