Razdelitev premoženja ob ustanovitvi nove občine

diplomsko delo

Tanja Karla Jeglič (Author), Boštjan Brezovnik (Mentor)

Abstract

Namen diplomskega dela je prikaz izvrševanja ustavno zagotovljene pravice do lokalne samouprave. Opazovanje njenega razvoja skozi prizmo časa in prostora pove, da pravica do lokalne samouprave ni bila in ni tako samoumevna, kot jo dojemamo danes in tu. Danes in tu je predmet predpisov Evropske unije, demokratično razvite države pa ji namenjajo mesto v svojih najvišjih pravnih aktih. Temeljno in osrednje načelo lokalne samouprave je načelo subsidiarnosti, ki postavlja posameznika v sam center družbe. Ni pa načelo subsidiarnosti le načelo lokalne samouprave, ampak se odraža na vseh ravneh današnje Evrope. Dati pravico posameznikom, da se na podlagi zakona lahko odločijo, da bodo zadeve, ki se jih dotikajo, reševali v okviru takšne lokalne skupnosti, ki bo njihove interese pri zadovoljevanju potreb kar najbolje zastopala, je pokazatelj demokratičnosti in decentralizacije neke družbe. Izvrševanje pravice do lokalne samouprave se praktično odraža v ustanavljanju lokalnih skupnosti, pri nas so to občine, kot njihova temeljna oblika. V skladu z načelom subsidiarnosti se v praksi dogajajo tudi teritorialne spremembe obstoječih občin. Nove občine se ustanavljajo z zadostitvijo zakonsko določenih razlogov in pogojev, med katerimi je na prvem mestu odločitev lokalne skupnosti. Ena izmed posledic ustanovitve nove občine pa je tudi razdelitev premoženja med preostankom prejšnje občine in novonastalo občino. Zakon določa načine in kriterije razdelitve. Sporazumno kot primaren način razdelitve premoženja in zakonsko, če v predpisanih rokih ni opravljena sporazumna razdelitev premoženja. Opis praktičnih primerov kaže, da so ravno s tem običajno največje težave pri oblikovanju nove občine, ker se vpletene občine ne morejo dogovoriti in skupnega premoženja razdeliti sporazumno. V primerih, ki jih bom posebej izpostavila, se je pri prvem vpletenim občinam uspelo dogovoriti o razdelitvi skupnega premoženja, v drugem primeru pa do sporazumne razdelitve ni prišlo, zato sta vpleteni občini enostransko določili (deklarirali) svoje premoženje, po principih, ki jih določa zakon. Ali je bilo to vsebinsko pravilno, bo pokazal čas.

Keywords

lokalna samouprava;lokalna skupnost;premoženje;razdelitev premoženja;diplomska dela;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2011
Source:	Maribor
Typology:	2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:	UM PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher:	[T.K. Jeglič]
UDC:	34(043.2)
COBISS:	4223787
Views:	1921
Downloads:	113
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary title:	ESTABLISHMENT OF THE NEW MUNICIPALITY RELATED WITH PROPERTY DIVIDING
Secondary abstract:	Purpose of this study is to show the implementation of the constitutionally guaranteed right to local self-government. Observation of its development through the prism of time and space, says that was not and is not so obvious, as we know it today, and here. Today and here is subject to regulations of the European Union, the democratic developed countries devote her place in their highest legal acts. Fundamental and central principle, the principle of subsidiarity, which puts the individual at the very center of society. Not only the principle of local self-government, but is reflected at all levels in today's Europe. Give individuals the right to under the law may decide that matters to be resolved by passing under such local communities that their interests will be in meeting the needs of the most represented, is an indicator of democracy and the decentralization of a company. Exercising the right of local self-government almost reflected in the establishment of local communities in our country are the municipalities, as their primary format. For that reason, in practice, place the territorial changes to existing municipalities. New communities are being established by serving the statutory reasons and conditions. One of the consequences of its establishment is property division of the former municipality between the newly created one. The Act specifies the procedures and criteria division. Agreement, as a primary mode and legally (property division by law), if within the prescribed period is not made an amicable division. Description of first practical case is example of good practice (know- how). No mutual agreement was made, but they managed to solve the problem with dividing property with taking some unilateral minucipal acts. Without taking legal action those acts were “recognized” by opposite party and division ended. Description of second practical example shows that property division is usually the greatest difficulty in creating a new municipality. Usually the involved parties can not or do not want to agree with proposed solutions of it. So they unilaterally determine (declare) their property, according to the principles laid down by law. Whether it is substantively and procedural correct, time (court) will tell.
Secondary keywords:	Local self-government;Local Community;The principle of Subsidiarity;Establishment of Municipality;Property;Consensual Property Division;Non- consensual Property Division or Property Division by law;
URN:	URN:SI:UM:
Type (COBISS):	Undergraduate thesis
Thesis comment:	Univ. v Mariboru, Pravna fak.
Pages:	47 str.
Keywords (UDC):	social sciences;družbene vede;law;jurisprudence;pravo;pravoznanstvo;
ID:	1014562