diplomsko delo univerzitetnega študijskega programa
Abstract
Pri projektiranju podpornih zidov v praksi le redkokdaj izvajamo detajlno analizo potresnih vplivov; če že, se poslužujemo konservativnih poenostavitev.
V pričujočem diplomskem delu je predstavljen celostni pristop geotehnične analize AB podpornega zidu. Najprej je obdelana stabilnost pod statičnimi pogoji v skladu z EN 1997-1, nato pa sta primerjani dve metodi analize seizmičnih vplivov; psevdo-statična, kot jo priporoča EN 1998-5 ter dinamična, kot sta jo predlagala Chowdhury in Dasgupta (2009b). Slednja je obravnavana v dveh delih; najprej pod predpostavko, da je zid togo vpet v tla, nato pa še z upoštevanjem dinamične interakcije objekt-zemljina (Chowdhury, 2011).
Primerjava rezultatov obeh seizmičnih analiz na izbranem primeru je pokazala podobne vrednosti notranjih statičnih količin pridobljenih s psevdo-statično ter prvim delom dinamične metode, medtem ko vrednosti dobljene z drugim delom dinamične metode nekoliko odstopajo in so se izkazale kot maksimalne.
Keywords
geotehnika;potresno inženirstvo;podporni zid;psevdo statična analiza;dinamična analiza;
Data
Language: |
Slovenian |
Year of publishing: |
2011 |
Source: |
Maribor |
Typology: |
2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis |
Organization: |
UM FGPA - Faculty of Civil Engineering, Transportation Engineering and Architecture |
Publisher: |
[Z. Radić] |
UDC: |
624.131.5:624.16(043.2) |
COBISS: |
15243542
|
Views: |
2386 |
Downloads: |
717 |
Average score: |
0 (0 votes) |
Metadata: |
|
Other data
Secondary language: |
English |
Secondary title: |
Geomechanical analysis of a RC retaining wall considering seismic actions |
Secondary abstract: |
A detailed analysis of seismic effects is rarely carried out while designing retaining walls and if so, conservative simplifications are used.
In the following thesis a complete approach to geotechnical analysis of a RC retaining wall is presented. Firstly the stability under static conditions in accordance with EN 1997-1 is considered, followed by a comparison of two distinct methods of seismic analysis, namely the pseudo-static analysis, as recommended by EN 1998-5 and a dynamic analysis as proposed by Chowdhury and Dasgupta (2009b). The later is dealt with in two parts; in the beginning it is assumed the wall is fixed in the ground and in the second part the dynamic soil-structure interaction is considered (Chowdhury, 2011).
Result comparison on a worked example has shown similar values of shear and moments obtained with the pseudo-static and the first part of the dynamic analysis, while the values obtained with the second part of the dynamic analysis slightly differ and represent the maximum values. |
Secondary keywords: |
geotechnics;earthquake engineering;retaining wall;pseudo static analysis;dynamic analysis; |
URN: |
URN:SI:UM: |
Type (COBISS): |
Undergraduate thesis |
Thesis comment: |
Univ. v Mariboru, Fak. za gradbeništvo |
Pages: |
IX, 114 f. |
Keywords (UDC): |
applied sciences;medicine;technology;uporabne znanosti;medicina;tehnika;engineering;technology in general;inženirstvo;tehnologija na splošno;civil and structural engineering in general;gradbena tehnika;gradbeništvo;substructures;earthworks;foundations;tunnelling;spodnje nosilne konstrukcije (podporne konstrukcije;spodnji ustroji);zemeljska dela (ki so rezultat izkopavanja in nasipanja);temelji;gradnja predorov;applied sciences;medicine;technology;uporabne znanosti;medicina;tehnika;engineering;technology in general;inženirstvo;tehnologija na splošno;civil and structural engineering in general;gradbena tehnika;gradbeništvo;substructures;earthworks;foundations;tunnelling;spodnje nosilne konstrukcije (podporne konstrukcije;spodnji ustroji);zemeljska dela (ki so rezultat izkopavanja in nasipanja);temelji;gradnja predorov; |
ID: |
1015099 |