delo diplomskega seminarja
Eva Jelen (Author), Vesna Čančer (Mentor)

Abstract

Uporaba računovodskih programov se zmeraj bolj uveljavlja v podjetjih, saj močno olajšuje delo računovodske stroke. V zelo kratkoročnem obdobju se je intenzivno povečala ponudba različnih programov za opravljanje računovodskih del. To pa je razlog, da je priporočljivo presoditi, kateri program je najbolj učinkovit in kakovosten ter hkrati cenovno dostopen, skratka vreden nakupa. V poslovni praksi poznamo več načinov odločanja, ki so lahko zelo zanimivi in koristni za uporabo, v delu diplomskega seminarja smo se odločili za večkriterijsko odločanje za izbiro med tremi računovodskimi programi – Pantheon, Minimax in e-Računi. Na voljo smo imeli veliko programov, omenjene tri smo izbrali zaradi zadostnih informacij na spletu. Poleg tega smo izbrali najboljši program, ki je primeren za računovodske servise. S pomočjo podatkov, ki so dostopni na spletnih straneh izbranih računovodskih programov, smo izoblikovali kriterije in podkriterije, na podlagi katerih smo ob pomoči programa Expert Choice skušali priti do cilja, ki smo si ga zadali na začetku: »Izbira najboljšega računovodskega programa«. Program Expert Choice, ki smo ga uporabili pri odločanju med računovodskimi programi, je računalniška podpora metodi analitičnega hierarhičnega procesa (metodi AHP). Za metodo AHP je značilno, da pri razvrščanju alternativ uporabimo razmerno skalo. Problem odločanja smo strukturirali v obliki odločitvenega drevesa, nato pa so sledili naslednji koraki: določitev uteži kriterijem in meritev vrednosti alternativ, čemur je sledila sinteza. Proces smo zaključili z izdelavo analize občutljivosti pridobljenih rezultatov. Izkazalo se je, da ima najvišjo vrednost program Minimax.

Keywords

računovodstvo;programi;informacijski sistemi;večkriterialno odločanje;kriteriji;odločanje;stroški;alternative;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Source: Maribor
Typology: 2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization: UM EPF - Faculty of Economics and Business
Publisher: [E. Jelen]
UDC: 519.85:657
COBISS: 11287324 Link will open in a new window
Views: 1611
Downloads: 270
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: ǂThe ǂuse of the multicriteria decision-making method for the selection of an accounting program
Secondary abstract: The use of the accounting programs is increasingly recognized in enterprises, because it highly simplifies the work of the accounting profession. In a very short period the offer of various programs for the provision of accounting services has intensively increased. This is the reason why it is advisable to consider which program is the most effective and qualitative and also affordable, in short, worth buying. In business practice we know several ways of decision-making that can be very interesting and beneficial; therefore, we decided to use a multicriteria decision-making for choosing among three accounting programs – Pantheon, Minimax and e-Računi. We had many programs at our disposal; however, we chose these three because of a sufficient amount of information offered on the internet. In addition, we chose the best program appropriate for accounting services. By using the data available on the websites of the selected accounting programs, we formed the criteria and attributes, and with the help of the program Expert Choice we tried to reach the goal we set at the beginning: » The selection of the best accounting program. » The program Expert Choice, which was used for the selection among the accounting programs, is a computer support for the method of analytic hierarhic process. It is typical for the AHP method that we use a ratio scale in classifying the alternatives. We structured the decision-making problem in the form of a decision-making tree, then the following steps were used: determination of the weights of criteria and the measurements of alternatives, followed by a synthesis. We completed the process by making a sensitivity analysis of the results obtained. The results show that Minimax has the highest rank.
Secondary keywords: accounting program;multicriteria decision-making;AHP;Expert Choice;criteria;cost;benefits;alternative;choice;
URN: URN:SI:UM:
Type (COBISS): Final seminar paper
Thesis comment: Univ. v Mariboru, Ekonomsko-poslovna fak.
Pages: 41 str., 4 str. pril.
Keywords (UDC): mathematics;natural sciences;naravoslovne vede;matematika;mathematics;matematika;operational research (or): mathematical theories and methods;operacijsko raziskovanje;mathematical programming;applied sciences;medicine;technology;uporabne znanosti;medicina;tehnika;communication and transport industries;accountancy;business management;public relations;komunikacije in transport;knjigovodstvo;poslovni menedžment;stiki z javnostjo;accountancy;računovodstvo;
ID: 1026419