magistrsko delo
Lina Burkelc Juras (Author), Aleš Ferčič (Mentor)

Abstract

V magistrskem delu bo obravnavano vprašanje pristopa EU k EKČP. Pravni temelj za pristop predstavlja člen 6 PEU, ki ga je predstavila Lizbonska pogodba. Vendar sama sprememba člena 6 ne zadošča, da bi EU postala pogodbenica EKČP. Za takšen rezultat mora EU izpogajati specifičen sporazum o pristopu s Svetom Evrope, katerega vsebina že dalj časa sproža velike polemike. Po napornih pogajanjih in usklajevanjih je bil leta 2013 oblikovan Osnutek sporazuma o pristopu EU k EKČP. Žal tudi vsebina Osnutka sporazuma sama po sebi ne zadošča za uradni pristop EU k EKČP, saj se pojavljajo številne procesne, institucionalne in vsebinske ovire, ki imajo pomemben vpliv na morebiten dokončen pristop EU k EKČP. Nanje je opozorilo Sodišče EU v Mnenju 2/13, v katerem je trudoma izpogajani Osnutek sporazuma označilo za nezdružljivega s pravom EU in opozorilo na več težavnih vprašanj, ki naj bi jih odpiral. V magistrskem delu so predstavljene načrtovana ureditev iz Osnutka sporazuma, stališča Sodišča EU iz problematičnega Mnenja 2/13 in analiza možnih odzivov na izpostavljene težave in predloge Sodišča EU. Zaradi večnih kritik EU in Mnenja 2/13 se postavlja vprašanje, ali je pristop EU k EKČP glede na predstavljeno dejansko stanje sploh še možen, če je odgovor na to vprašanje pritrdilen, pa tudi, če je pristop sploh še zaželjen (oz. koristen).

Keywords

Evropska konvencija o človekovih pravicah;Pristop EU k EKČP;Mnenje 2/13;varstvo človekovih pravic;odnos med Sodiščem EU in ESČP;težave pristopa;možni odzivi;magistrska dela;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization: UM PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher: [L. Burkelc Juras]
UDC: 342.7:061.6 EU(043.3)
COBISS: 5458475 Link will open in a new window
Views: 1773
Downloads: 463
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: Is EU accession to ECHR still possible?
Secondary abstract: The thesis deals with the question of possible EU accession to the ECHR. The legal basis for accession can be found in Art. 6 TEU, brought forth by the Treaty of Lisbon. The wording of Art. 6 TEU is unfortunately not sufficient to make EU one of the signatories of the ECHR. EU must also agree with the Council of Europe on the substance of an Accession Agreement, which seems to be a greater problem than previously expected. A Draft Accession Agreement was formed in 2013 after years of strenuous negotiations. Regrettably, even the Draft Accession Agreement does not suffice for an official EU accession, since there are plenty of procedural, institutional and substantial obstacles. CJEU shed some light on them in its Opinion 2/13, in which it ruled the Draft Accession Agreement as incompatible with EU law. This thesis shortly introduces the content of the Draft Accession Agreement, Opinion 2/13 and analyzes the possible solutions to the mentioned obstacles and suggestions of the CJEU. It also deals with the plentiful critiques of the EU and Opinion 2/13 and questions, whether accession in the current situation even remains an option, and if it does, whether accession is even still desirable (or beneficial).
Secondary keywords: EU accession to the ECHR;Opinion 2/13;human rights protection;the relationship between CJEU and ECtHR;issues of the accession;possible solutions;
URN: URN:SI:UM:
Type (COBISS): Master's thesis/paper
Thesis comment: Univ. v Mariboru, Pravna fak.
Pages: 87 str.
ID: 10860730