magistrsko delo
Abstract
Uporaba oboroženih brezpilotnih letalnikov se je močno razširila po letu 2001, ko so bili prvič uporabljeni v zračnem napadu v Afganistanu. Za problematično se je izkazala predvsem na območjih izven oboroženih spopadov v t. i. »vojni proti terorju«, kjer so opazne številne posledice na civilnem prebivalstvu. Poleg telesnih in psihičnih je bilo zaznati še ekonomske posledice, spremembe v običajih in navadah skupnosti ter vpliv na vsakdanje življenje civilistov na bombardiranih območjih. Statistika o številu napadov z oboroženimi brezpilotnimi letalniki in o njihovih žrtvah je težko dosegljiva, saj se prikriva njihovo uporabo na že tako nevarnih območjih za nevladne organizacije, raziskovalce in novinarje. Analiza uporabe oboroženih brezpilotnih letalnikov je pokazala neupoštevanje pravil mednarodnega humanitarnega prava in prava človekovih pravic v izbiri tarče in identifikaciji žrtev napadov, saj se civilistom ne nudi zadostne zaščite pri uporabi tega vojaškega sredstva. Konkretni zakonodajni okvir o njihovi uporabi še ni bil sprejet ne v evropskem ne v mednarodnem prostoru, čeprav se o posledicah civilnih žrtev razpravlja že več let v sklopu različnih organizacij. Še vedno pa se za napade ne zahteva odgovornosti države izvajalke ali pa se izvaja pristranske in netransparentne preiskave. Primerjava s konvencionalnimi pilotiranimi letalniki ne kaže na učinkovitost novejšega vojaškega sredstva v korelaciji s kolateralno škodo, prispeva pa k negativni propagandi države izvajalke napadov.
Keywords
brezpilotna letala;brezpilotni letalniki;droni;oboroženi spopadi;nesreče;civilne žrtve;magistrska dela;
Data
Language: |
Slovenian |
Year of publishing: |
2017 |
Typology: |
2.09 - Master's Thesis |
Organization: |
UM FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice |
Publisher: |
[S. Železnik] |
UDC: |
355/359+623.746-519(043.2) |
COBISS: |
3414506
|
Views: |
1073 |
Downloads: |
118 |
Average score: |
0 (0 votes) |
Metadata: |
|
Other data
Secondary language: |
English |
Secondary title: |
Civilian victims of armed unmanned aerial vehicles |
Secondary abstract: |
The use of armed unmanned aerial vehicles has spread widely after 2001, when they were first used in an airstrike in Afghanistan. Their use outside of armed conflicts has been especially problematic in the so-called war on terror, in which it has severely impacted civilian inhabitants. In addition to physical and psychological damages, there have also been economic consequences, changes in customs and habits of the community with an impact on the everyday life of civilians in bombed areas. The statistics of unmanned aerial vehicle attacks are hard to attain, since their use in already dangerous areas for NGOs, researchers and reporters is being covered up. The analysis of the use of armed unmanned aerial vehicles has shown non-compliance with the rules of international humanitarian law and human rights law in targeting and identifying victims of the attacks, since civilians are not offered adequate protection in the use of this military asset. A specific legislative framework on its use does not exist in the European or the international sphere, even though the consequences on civilian victims have been a subject of discourse in various organisations for several years. Still, there is no demand for accountability for these attacks and the investigations performed are biased and non-transparent. The comparison to conventional manned aircrafts does not imply a better effectiveness of the newer military asset in correlation to collateral damage, rather a contribution to the negative propaganda of the attacking State abroad. |
Secondary keywords: |
civilian;civilian casualties;armed unmanned aerial vehicles;armed conflict; |
URN: |
URN:SI:UM: |
Type (COBISS): |
Master's thesis/paper |
Thesis comment: |
Univ. v Mariboru, Fak. za varnostne vede |
Pages: |
VIII, 99 str. |
ID: |
10860999 |