magistrsko delo
Melita Šegovc (Author), Matjaž Tratnik (Mentor)

Abstract

Skupna trgovinska politika EU proti tretjim državam sodi med tiste politike, kjer so države članice EU svoje pristojnosti prenesle na raven EU, kar pomeni, da je govora o izključni pristojnosti Unije. Trgovina sodi med najpomembnejše gonilo ustvarjanja delovnih mest in gospodarske rasti. Ocenjeno je, da naj bi bilo kar 90 odstotkov globalne rasti, v dolgoročnem obdobju, ustvarjene zunaj EU. Ključni ukrepi, s katerimi se uresničujejo cilji ustvarjanja učinkovite prostotrgovinske politike, so prostotrgovinski sporazumi. Le-ti zasedajo osrednjo vlogo na področju trgovine v današnjem času in pomembno vplivajo na vsakdan državljanov članic EU. Ovire v obliki carin in dajatev so zadnja leta na precej nizki ravni in zgolj ukrepi na tem področju ne bi prinesli vidnejših rezultatov. Zaradi tega je na tem področju cilj dodatna liberalizacija z odpravo necarinskih ovir, ki se pojavljajo pri čezmejnem trgovanju. Le-te se pojavljajo v različnih zakonih in skozi postavljene standarde v državah, ki so pogosto namenjeni varovanju javnega interesa, vplivajo pa na čezmejno trgovanje. V zadnjem času je eden najbolj pomembnih prostotrgovinskih sporazumov, o katerem se EU pogaja že od leta 2009, CETA, Comprehensive economic and trade agreement oz. Celovit gospodarski in trgovinski sporazum, ki ga EU sklepa s Kanado. V magistrskem delu sem se ukvarjala z vsebino prostotrgovinskega sporazuma CETA ter poskušala osvetliti področja, ki se s sporazumom CETA najpomembneje spreminjajo, poskušala sem izpostaviti problematiko določenih institutov in ureditev posameznih poglavij v sporazumu, ki tako med strokovno kakor tudi laično javnostjo vzbujajo največ pomislekov in nezaupanja.

Keywords

prostotrgovinski sporazum;EU;Kanada;CETA;svetovna trgovina;magistrska dela;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization: UM PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher: [M. Šegovc]
UDC: 339.542.2(043.2)
COBISS: 5449003 Link will open in a new window
Views: 1599
Downloads: 345
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary abstract: Common trade policy of the EU towards third countries is one of those policies, where member states of the EU transferred their rights to the EU. This means that trade policy is an exclusive EU competence. Trade in general is the driving force of economic growth and job creation. It is estimated that 90 percent of the growth in the long-term would be created outside the EU. The key measures, with which the goals of an efficient free trade are being put into effect, are free trade agreements. In the area of trade, they are the most important measures that significantly affect also the everyday lives of residents of the member states of EU. Barriers to free trade in a form of customs, are substantially low in the last years, so measures, which would further eliminate only those, would not make a significant difference. The main objective is to eliminate the non-custom barriers to free trade, which would lead to further liberalisation. The non-custom barriers are being set with different laws and regulations which are meant to protect the public interest but also influence the international trade. That is also the reason why lately one of the most important free trade agreements, which is being negotiated since 2009, is CETA, Comprehensive economic and trade agreement, concluded between European Union and Canada. In my Master’s thesis I researched the content of the free trade agreement and tried to highlight the areas which are being most changed most significantly, I tried to present the most important issues of some of the institutes and the regulation of some of the areas of the free trade agreement, which cause the most distrust and second thoughts by the professionals and the public.
Secondary keywords: free trade agreement;EU;Canada;CETA;global trade;
URN: URN:SI:UM:
Type (COBISS): Master's thesis/paper
Thesis comment: Univ. v Mariboru, Pravna fak.
Pages: 63 f.
ID: 10865000