Humor v antologijah Enci benci na kamenci

Abstract

V slovenskem otroškem izročilu se pojavlja humor, kot ga utemeljujejo različne teorije. Po Attardu (1994) sta osrednja predstavnika teorije superiornosti Platon in Aristotel - po tej teoriji smejanje sledi spoznanju, da je človek, ki se smeje, boljši od tistega, ki se mu smeje. Kant in Schopenhauer sta predstavnika teorije neujemanja, ki temelji na neskladju resničnosti med pojmom in objektom. Bergson v Eseju o smehu (1977) dokazuje, da lahko vse napake postanejo smešne; smešna oseba nam je na začetku pogosto simpatična. Kmecl v Mali literarni teoriji (1995) pa navaja, da je humor etološka vrsta, ki temelji na vedrem, svobodnem razpoloženju/obnašanju, na nasmejanem distanciranju od neprijetnosti, na duševni uravnovešenosti in miselnem odnosu do sveta. V mladinski književnosti moramo biti pozorni tudi na bralčevo/poslušalčevo starost, saj je od otrokove starosti odvisno, kaj je zanj smešno, in na okoliščine (realni čas, splošni kulturni nivo, socialni status otroka). V otroškem ljudskem izročilu se pojavljajo različne vloge humorja: nonsensni humor, ki ima poleg posredne spoznavne tudi očitno zabavno vlogo, vzgojni humor komičnega (nezglednega) otroškega lika, ki poleg zabavne vloge posredno vzgaja, ter humor oporekanja, ki se izraža v tabujih. Obravnavane pesmi so iz otroškega ljudskega izročila in so prikaz konkretnih primerov ter značilnosti uvrščanja med literarna dela z elementi humornega.

Keywords

slovenska otroška poezija;humor;teorije humorja;vloge humorja;otroško ljudsko izročilo;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2012
Typology:	1.02 - Review Article
Organization:	UM PEF - Faculty of Education
Publisher:	Pedagoška fakulteta
UDC:	821.163.6.09-93-1
COBISS:	19585288
ISSN:	1855-4431
Parent publication:	Revija za elementarno izobraževanje
Views:	953
Downloads:	147
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary title:	Humour in the anthologies Encibenci na kamenci
Secondary abstract:	The humour which appears in Slovenian children's folk tradition is supported by various theories. Attardo claims that Plato and Aristotle are two main representatives of the theory of superiority, according to which laughing is a result of the realisation that the one who laughs is better than the one who does not. Immanuel Kant and Artur Schopenhauer, on the other hand, are representatives of the mismatch theory based on the (reality of) conflict between the concept and the object. In his work Esej o smehu, Bergson proves that any mistake can become humorous, yet we also tend to like the funny character from the very beginning. In Mala literarna teorija (1995), Slovenian theorist Matjaž Kmecl states that humour is an ethological form characterised by cheerful carefree mood/behaviour, smiling as a means to distance oneself from unease, mental balance of the personas, and mental attitude towards the world. As regards children's literature, we have to consider the reader's/listener's age which is a key factor in what children perceive as funny as well as the circumstances such as real time, general cultural level, and social status of the child. Humour plays different roles in children's folk tradition. Nonsense humour combines the indirect cognitive aspect with the apparently entertaining aspect. As the word itself suggests, the aim of educational humour based on a comic child character who is far from being a role model is to educate and to entertain. Last but not least, there is the humour of contradiction, which is expressed in taboos. All the poems discussed herein are taken from children's folk tradition and are demonstrations of concrete examples and characteristics, which classify them as literary works with humorous elements.
Secondary keywords:	Slovenian children's poetry;humour;theory of humour;roles of humour;children's folk tradition;
URN:	URN:NBN:SI
Type (COBISS):	Scientific work
Pages:	str. 87-100
Volume:	ǂLetn. ǂ5
Issue:	ǂšt. ǂ4
Chronology:	dec. 2012
ID:	10865466