Zaslišanje prič v predkazenskem postopku

magistrsko delo

Marko Škerjanc (Author), Zlatko Dežman (Mentor)

Abstract

Magistrsko delo predstavlja zaslišanje prič v predkazenskem postopku s strani državnega tožilca oziroma policije. Ministrstvo za pravosodje Republike Slovenije je podalo Predlog zakona o spremembah in dopolnitvah zakona o kazenskem postopku ZKP-N. Z novelo zakona se želi postopoma uveljaviti nov model kazenskega postopka v Republiki Sloveniji. Kot nov model kazenskega postopka se misli, namesto sedanjega dvofaznega predhodnega postopka, enofazni preiskovalni postopek, v katerem bi preiskovalno funkcijo opravljal državni tožilec in policija, preiskovalni sodnik pa bi obdržal le vlogo garanta oziroma varuha obdolženčevih pravic. Prve spremembe, k novemu modelu kazenskega postopka, so med drugim tudi možnost zaslišanja priče s strani državnega tožilca oziroma policije v predkazenskem postopku, kot tudi nekoliko drugačna ureditev pogojev za uvedbo preiskave. Predlagane spremembe so doživele nasprotovanja pravnih strokovnjakov, ker nov koncept policijske oziroma tožilske preiskave odpira nekatera ustavnopravna in doktrinarna vprašanja. V magistrskem delu je prvo predstavljen predkazenski postopek in sodna preiskava po trenutno veljavni ureditvi. Nato je predstavljena priča kot dokaz v kazenskem postopku. Za razumevanje današnjih sprememb je predstavljen tudi zgodovinski razvoj kazenskega procesnega prava na območju Slovenije s poudarkom na predkazenski postopek in preiskavo. V drugi polovici magistrskega dela pa je predstavljen Predlog novele ZKP-N in kakšna bo vloga preiskovalnega sodnika po noveli ter ustavnopravna in doktrinarna vprašanja glede zaslišanja prič v predkazenskem postopku s strani državnega tožilca oziroma policije. V sklepu magistrskega dela pa sem predstavil še moje stališče do predlagane ureditve.

Keywords

predkazenski postopek;preiskava;kazenski postopek;novela ZKP-N;zaslišanje prič v predkazenskem postopku;policijsko-tožilska preiskava;magistrska dela;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2017
Typology:	2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:	UM PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher:	M. Škerjanc]
UDC:	343.143(043.3)
COBISS:	5497131
Views:	1917
Downloads:	375
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary title:	Hearing of witnesses in the pre-criminal procedure
Secondary abstract:	The Master's thesis presents the hearing of witnesses in the pre-criminal procedure, performed by the State Prosecutor or the police. The Ministry of Justice of the Republic of Slovenia has submitted a proposal for an Act Amending the Criminal Procedure Act (ZKP-N). With the amendment to the law, they wish to gradually enforce a new model of criminal procedures in the Republic of Slovenia. Instead of the current two-stage pre-criminal procedure, the new model of criminal procedures consists of a one-stage investigation procedure, in which the State Prosecutor and the police implement the investigative function, and the investigating judge would only retain the role of a guarantor or guardian of the defendant’s rights. The first amendments to the new model of criminal procedures also include inter alia the possibility of hearing a witness, performed by the State Prosecutor or the police in the pre-criminal procedure, as well as slightly different conditions for the initiation of an investigation. Some legal experts have opposed the proposed amendments, since certain constitutional and doctrinal issues arise due to the new concept of investigation, performed by the prosecution or the police. First, the Master’s thesis defines the pre-criminal procedure and the judicial investigation according to the current arrangement. Then, the witness is presented as evidence in criminal proceedings. To understand these amendments, the historical development of the criminal procedural law in Slovenia with the emphasis on pre-criminal procedure and investigation is also described. The second half of the Master's thesis presents the proposal for the Amending Act ZKP-N and the role of the investigating judge according to the amendment, as well as any constitutional and doctrinal issues regarding the hearing of witnesses in the pre-trial procedure, performed by the State Prosecutor or the police. In the conclusion of the Master's thesis, I have expressed my view concerning the proposed regulations.
Secondary keywords:	pre-criminal procedure;investigation;criminal procedure;Amending Act ZKP-N;hearing of witnesses in the pre-criminal procedure;police and prosecution investigation;
URN:	URN:SI:UM:
Type (COBISS):	Master's thesis/paper
Thesis comment:	Univ. v Mariboru, Pravna fak.
Pages:	80 str.
ID:	10872641