magistrsko delo
Maja Vogrič (Author), Vesna Štemberger (Mentor)

Abstract

Slovenija in Nizozemska sta državi, ki se v marsičem zelo razlikujeta. Njuni zgodovini in njun razvoj sta bila popolnoma ločena in tako sta se tudi šolska sistema skozi zgodovino razvijala zelo različno. Ko je leta 1917 nizozemsko šolstvo naredilo že velik korak naprej glede vrednotenja zasebnega in javnega šolstva, je slovensko šolstvo še vedno sledilo ciljem avstro-ogrske in jugoslovanske oblasti. Mnogo različnih razlogov je pripeljalo do tega, da se danes šolstvo med državama razlikuje tako organizacijsko kot tudi vsebinsko. Kljub temu je v učnih načrtih mnogo stvari, ki jih najdemo tako v enem kot tudi v drugem učnem načrtu za športno vzgojo. Pri primerjavi slovenskega in nizozemskega učnega načrta smo ugotovili, da se pojavljajo razlike tako med številom ur, namenjenih predmetu šport, kot tudi pri opredelitvi ciljev v posameznem učnem načrtu, največja razlika pa se pojavi pri sami strukturi dokumentov, saj slovenski učni načrt deluje bolj kot pripomoček za načrtovanje in organizacijo športne vzgoje, medtem ko je nizozemski učni načrt nabor vaj in posnetkov, ki jih lahko učenci izvajajo pri športni vzgoji. Presenetljivo pa se vsebinsko učna načrta ne razlikujeta tako močno, kot bi lahko sprva pričakovali. Poleg vsebine in strukture učnih načrtov smo primerjali dolgoročne učinke športne vzgoje na odrasle ljudi in pri tem ugotovili precejšno spremembo trenda na pogled športne aktivnosti odraslih ljudi v prostem času. Tako smo zanimivo primerjavo lahko naredili tudi med ugotovitvami razlik v učnih načrtih in aktivnostjo odraslih ter opredelili še dodatne faktorje, ki vplivajo na aktivno življenje ljudi.

Keywords

učni načrt;Slovenija;Nizozemska;primerjava;predmet šport;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization: UL PEF - Faculty of Education
Publisher: [M. Vogrič]
UDC: 796:373.3(043.3)
COBISS: 11832393 Link will open in a new window
Views: 758
Downloads: 209
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: Comparison of Slovenian and Dutch curriculums for physical education in primary school
Secondary abstract: Slovenia and the Netherlands vary in many things. Their history, development and educational system were put together very differently. The Netherlands made a step forward in 1917 when they made private and public education equally valued when Slovenia still followed and obeyed Austro-Hungarian and Yugoslavian authorities. Due to many facts from the past and the current situation, the educational system is different in regards to its organization as well as content. Nevertheless, in both curriculums there are numerous things that we can find in both Slovenian and Dutch curriculum for physical education in primary school. In our research we have found that there are some differences between Slovenian and Dutch curriculum for physical education. There are differences in the number of lessons planned for physical education, the definition of the subject is quite different in each curriculum, but the greatest difference appears to be the structure of the curriculum. The Slovenian curriculum is a document that helps teachers plan lessons, while the Dutch curriculum is more or less a tool providing ideas of what to do at lessons of physical education. What we did not expect was the content, which is quite similar in both curriculums. We also compared long-term effects of physical education on adults, and we have discovered a significant difference in the trend in views on sport in people’s spare time. We have made an interesting comparison on two fields: differences in curriculums and sport participation of adults while we have also emphasised the factors that influence the active life style.
Secondary keywords: primary education;physical education;osnovnošolski pouk;športna vzgoja;
File type: application/pdf
Type (COBISS): Master's thesis/paper
Thesis comment: Univ. v Ljubljani, Pedagoška fak., Oddelek za razredni pouk
Pages: VII, 77 str.
ID: 10883478