magistrsko delo
Abstract
Magistrsko delo se osredotoča na primerjavo rabe mentorstva in koučinga pri delu z brezposelno osebo z namenom uspešnega nastopa na trgu dela. Primerjava je izpeljana na podlagi treh izpeljanih procesov koučinga ter dveh procesov mentorstva. Preko uporabe metode participativnega akcijskega raziskovanja odgovarja na vprašanja, katera metoda je primernejša glede na potrebe brezposelne osebe za uspešen nastop na trgu dela, njene izkušnje, obstoječa znanja in veščine, katere so prednosti in slabosti posamezne metode pri delu z brezposelno osebo ter kakšna je učinkovitost metode z vidika usposobljenosti brezposelne osebe za uspešen nastop na trgu dela. Ugotovljeno je, da je učinkovitost posamezne metode v določeni meri odvisna od njenih značilnosti in izbornosti glede na izhodišča udeleženca. Koučing je bolj primeren za brezposelne osebe z zadostno energetsko opremljenostjo za aktivno sodelovanje v procesu, razvitimi zmožnostmi in veščinami samoupravljanja in samoregulacije ter predvsem z jasnimi zaposlitvenimi cilji. Mentorstvo je primernejša izbira v primerih, ko ima brezposelna oseba določene omejitve, ko potrebuje pridobiti konkretna znanja in šele razviti veščine za uspešen nastop na trgu dela ali ko so njeni zaposlitveni cilji nejasni ter potrebuje več časa, da jih lahko izoblikuje.
Keywords
mentorstvo;koučing;brezposelne osebe;participativno akcijsko raziskovanje;
Data
Language: |
Slovenian |
Year of publishing: |
2017 |
Typology: |
2.09 - Master's Thesis |
Organization: |
UL PEF - Faculty of Education |
Publisher: |
[S. Jagodnik] |
UDC: |
159.913-057.19(043.2) |
COBISS: |
11839561
|
Views: |
525 |
Downloads: |
110 |
Average score: |
0 (0 votes) |
Metadata: |
|
Other data
Secondary language: |
English |
Secondary title: |
A comparison of efficiency of mentoring and coaching the unemployed |
Secondary abstract: |
Master's thesis focuses on the comparison of mentoring and coaching of unemployed person entering labour market. Which approach is more siutable, considering unemployed person's needs, experience, knowledge and skills, which approach gives better results and what are advatages and disadvantages of both of them, are the questions anwsered by comparison between mentoring and coaching, based on three coaching and two mentoring process, using participatory action research approach. Effectiveness of the method depends on its characteristics and the needs of participant. Coaching is more suitable for an unemployed person with sufficient energy level for active participation in the process, developed abilities and skills of self-management and self-regulation and above all, with clear employment objectives. Mentoring is more suitable in cases where an unemployed person has certain limitations, when it needs to acquire specific knowledge and yet to develop skills for successful performance on the labor market, or when its employment objectives are unclear and needs more time to form them. |
Secondary keywords: |
unemployed;nezaposleni; |
File type: |
application/pdf |
Type (COBISS): |
Master's thesis/paper |
Thesis comment: |
Univ. v Ljubljani, Pedagoška fak., Supervizija, osebno in organizacijsko svetovanje |
Pages: |
94 str. |
ID: |
10883481 |