Toma Strle (Author)

Abstract

To provide an illustration of some of the author’s theses, I firstly discuss contemporary accounts of embodied decision-making. I argue that they do not endorse the embodied cognition thesis in its essential (or radical) scope and thus cannot provide a meaningful account of decision-making. Secondly, I briefly discuss researchers’ intrinsic embeddedness in their scientific culture and life-world and the associated inseparability of the subject and the world. I end the essay with a question pertaining to the seemingly endless circularity of knowledge emergence in cognitive science which, arguably, entails that we cannot reveal the “invariants of the mind.”

Keywords

odločanje (psihologija);mišljenje;spoznavanje;kognitivna nevroznanost;

Data

Language: English
Year of publishing:
Typology: 1.03 - Short Scientific Article
Organization: UL PEF - Faculty of Education
Publisher: Brussels : Vrije Universiteit Brussel
UDC: 159.955:165.194
COBISS: 11850057 Link will open in a new window
ISSN: 1782-348X
Views: 561
Downloads: 122
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary keywords: cognition;kognicija;
File type: application/pdf
Type (COBISS): Article
Pages: str. 76-78
Volume: ǂVol. ǂ13
Issue: ǂno. ǂ1
Chronology: 2017
ID: 10887001
Recommended works:
, no subtitle data available
, how cognitive science exerts influence on its findings
, študijsko gradivo za predmet Prvoosebno raziskovanje za študente 1. letnika študijskega programa Kognitivna znanost
, no subtitle data available
, študijsko gradivo za študente 1. letnika študijskega programa Kognitivna znanost