(magistrsko diplomsko delo)
Polona Kveder (Author), Jerca Kramberger Škerl (Mentor)

Abstract

Magistrsko diplomsko delo obravnava spore majhne vrednosti v slovenskem pravu. Njihova posebnost je, da je vrednost tožbenega zahtevka nizka in da so lahko stroški za rešitev spora nesorazmerno visoki oziroma je možno, da celo presežejo vrednost spora. Zato Zakon o pravdnem postopku določa posebno ureditev teh sporov, ki zasleduje načelo ekonomičnosti in hitrosti postopka. Zakonodajalec se je pri ureditvi postopka odločil za precej formalno urejen postopek s poudarkom na načelu pisnosti. V nalogi sem analizirala zakonsko ureditev v sporih majhne vrednosti, ugotavljala, kje so v praksi nastale težave in katera vprašanja je zakon pustil odprta ter kako na to odgovarja sodna praksa. Predstavila sem tudi, kaj o postopku in posameznih institutih menita teorija in praksa, ter dodala še svoje mnenje.

Keywords

spori majhne vrednosti;postopek v sporih majhne vrednosti;načelo ekonomičnosti in hitrosti postopka;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization: UL PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher: [P. Kveder]
UDC: 347(043.2)
COBISS: 15795537 Link will open in a new window
Views: 1994
Downloads: 752
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: Small claims dispute
Secondary abstract: My master's thesis covers small claims disputes in Slovene law. Their specific feature is that the value of the claim is low and that the costs for the resolution of the dispute are disproportionally high, they may even exceed the value of the dispute. Thus, the Civil Procedure Act provides for a specific arrangement of these disputes that adheres to the principles of cost efficiency and swiftness of procedure. In the regulation of the procedure, the legislators have opted for a quite formal procedure with an emphasis on the principle of written form. In my thesis, I analysed the legal regulation of small claims disputes, I tried to find out where problems in practice were, which issues had been left open by the law, and how case law is responding to this. Furthermore, I presented the opinion of theory and practice about the procedure and the individual institutes, and added my own opinion.
Secondary keywords: Small claims disputes;procedure in small claims disputes;principles of cost efficiency and swiftness of procedure.;
Type (COBISS): Master's thesis/paper
Study programme: 0
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE): 1970-01-01
Thesis comment: Univ. v Ljubljani, Pravna fak.
Pages: 56 f.
ID: 10909967