diplomsko delo
Ivo Devetak (Author), Marta Bon (Reviewer), Marko Šibila (Mentor), Marko Pocrnjič (Co-mentor)

Abstract

Namen diplomskega dela je bil ugotoviti značilnosti nogometne igre v fazi napada in v fazi obrambe pri ekipah Bayern Münchna in Juventusa v Ligi prvakov v sezoni 2015/2016, ter primerjati posamezne tehnično-taktične elemente nogometne igre med njima. Na podlagi posnetkov smo analizirali obe tekmi osmine finala Lige prvakov. Analizirali smo jih glede na devetnajst glavnih spremenljivk. Spremenljivke smo ločili glede na fazo igre v napadu ter fazo igre v obrambi. V fazi napada smo spremljali deset glavnih spremenljivk, v fazi obrambe pa devet. Pridobljene podatke smo nato statistično obdelali ter med seboj primerjali ločeno za vsako tekmo ter ločeno tudi za podaljška, ki sta bila izvedena na drugi tekmi. Podatke smo po primerjavi združili, združene podatke smo kasneje uporabili pri preverjanju hipotez. Po opravljeni analizi smo ugotovili, da sta se ekipi posluževali popolnoma različnega stila nogometne igre. Moštvo Juventusa se je na obeh tekmah posluževalo zaprtega stila igre, saj je svojo obrambo postavilo globoko na lastno polovico, svoje priložnosti so poskušali izkoristiti z izvedbo hitrih kontinuiranih napadov ter protinapadov. Moštvo Bayern Münchna se je posluževalo odprtega stila igre z izvedbo počasnih kontinuiranih napadov, svojo obrambo je na igrišču postavljalo zelo visoko, svojega nasprotnika so začeli napadati takoj po izgubljeni žogi. Oba vratarja sta se v večini situacij posluževala začetka napada s kratko podajo (Juventus: 32, Bayern: 44), prav tako sta si ekipi bili enotni pri izvedbi napada glede na mesto napada, saj sta svoje napade enakomerno izvajali tako prek sredine igrišča (Juventus: 74, Bayern: 109) kot tudi prek krilnih položajev (Juventus: 83, Bayern: 110). Moštvi sta se med seboj razlikovali predvsem pri izvedbi podaj, saj je nemška ekipa (1.618) skupno izvedla veliko več podaj kot italijanska (582), pri izvedbi le-teh pa so bili tudi bolj natančni. Igralci Bayerna so izvajali veliko kratkih podaj (1.123), medtem ko so se igralci Juventusa več posluževali srednje dolgih (118) in dolgih podaj (96). Nemci so na vrata nasprotnika sprožili več udarcev (Juventus: 28, Bayern: 40), vendar pri tem niso bili tako natančni kot Italijani (Juventus: 18, Bayern: 13), prav tako so si pripravili več priložnosti za dosego zadetka (55) kot njihov italijanski nasprotnik (40). Igralci Juventusa so svojo nadvlado nad nasprotnikom prikazali predvsem v individualnih dvobojih (Juventus: 174, Bayern: 136), saj so bili od nemške ekipe boljši tako v dvobojih z nogo oziroma telesom (Juvetnus: 100, Bayern 88) kot tudi v zračnih dvobojih z glavo (Juventus:74, Bayern:48), v ostalih segmentih igre(število napadov, število podaj, udarci na vrata, ustvarjene priložnosti za zadetek, tehnične napake igralcev, število kotov, posest žoge) pa so v večini prevladovali Bavarci.

Keywords

šport;nogomet;značilnosti igre;sodobni model igre;analiza igre;Juventus;Bayern München;Liga prvakov;faza napada;faza obrambe;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization: UL FŠ - Faculty of Sport
Publisher: [I. Devetak]
UDC: 796.332
COBISS: 5256369 Link will open in a new window
Views: 849
Downloads: 335
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: The analysis of matches in the round of 16 of UEFA Champions League between Juventus and Bayern München
Secondary abstract: The purpose of this diploma thesis is to establish the feature of football game in the attacking and defending phase in teams of Bayern München and Juventus in UEFA Champions League in the season 2015/2016, and then compare individual technical and tactical elements of football match between them. The analysis of both matches in the round of 16 of UEFA Champions League is based on the recordings of matches. Nineteen main variables which had been determined before the beginning of analysis were separated according to attacking and defending phase. Ten main variables were observed in the attacking phase and nine in the defending phase. The data were statistically analysed and compared separately for each match and overtimes performed on the second match. The data were then combined and later used for testing hypotheses. It was found out that teams made use of a totally different style of playing. Juventus used the closed style of game which means that the defence was set deep on its half. They tried to shoot on the goal with fast and continuous attacks and counterattacks while Bayern München made use of the open style of game with slow and continuous attacks. Its defence was set very high and they tried to intercept opponents’ attack right after the loss of the ball. Both goalkeepers mostly used short passes (Juventus: 32, Bayern: 44), at the beginning of the attack. Both teams were unified as far as the attack is concerned. Their attacks were evenly performed over the middle of the field (Juventus: 74, Bayern: 109) as well as over the wing positions (Juventus: 83, Bayern: 110). The difference between teams was seen in passes, because the German team (1.618) had many more passes than the Italian one (582). Their performance was also more accurate. Bayern had many short passes (1.123) while Juventus had more medium long passes (118) and long passes (96). Germans had more chances on shooting the goal (Juventus: 28, Bayern: 40), but they were not as accurate as their Italian opponent. Juventus showed its skills mostly at individual duels (Juventus: 174, Bayern: 136), because they were better in duels with leg or body (Juvetnus: 100, Bayern 88) and also in duels with head (Juventus:74, Bayern:48). Bavarians predominated in other segments of the game (number of attacks, number of passes, shoots on goal, opportunity for scoring goal, technical errors, numbers of corners, possesion).  
Secondary keywords: the analysis of match;attacking phases;defending phases;Juventus;Bayern;München;Champions League;
Type (COBISS): Bachelor thesis/paper
Study programme: 0
Thesis comment: Univ. v Ljubljani, Fak. za šport
ID: 10910120