magistrsko diplomsko delo
Maja Petrovič (Author), Ana Vlahek (Mentor)

Abstract

Magistrsko delo se nanaša na odnos dveh bolj obremenjenih mednarodnih sodišč – Sodišča Evropske unije in Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice. Obe sodišči delujeta v okviru dveh različnih sistemov, ki imata skupno točko, in sicer varstvo človekovih pravic. Čeprav so bili prvotni cilji Evropske unije večinoma ekonomski, se je kasneje tudi v tej organizaciji pokazala potreba po delovanju izven prvotno zastavljenih ciljev. Sodišče Evropske unije je s svojim sodnim aktivizmom ogromno pripomoglo k varstvu človekovih pravic v okviru Evropske unije, medtem ko je Svet Evrope in njegova najpomembnejša institucija Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice že od vsega začetka stremel k varstvu človekovih pravic. Čeprav je sedanja ureditev človekovih pravic zadovoljiva, pa je njena največja pomanjkljivost ta, da ni sistematično urejena, kar pomeni, da so lahko iste pravice v različnih virih različno urejene ter posledično nadzorovane s strani organov različnih organizacij. Z namenom harmonizacije ureditve na področju človekovih pravic, je Evropska unija že vrsto let nazaj pričela razmišljati o pristopu k Evropski konvenciji o človekovih pravicah. Kljub izrecni zavezi za pristop pa do realizacije slednjega še ni prišlo. Sodišče Evropske unije je konec leta 2014 zavrnilo dolgo pričakovan in široko odobravan osnutek pristopne pogodbe. Od mnogih nepričakovana odločitev Sodišča je sprožila val negativnih misli in ugibanj, kako se bo tendenca skladnega delovanja in prizanesljivosti med sodiščema razvijala v prihodnosti. V magistrskem delu z naslovom Odnos med Sodiščem Evropske unije in Evropskim sodiščem za človekove pravice obravnavam razvoj človekovih pravic v Evropski uniji, odnos med samima sodiščema ter harmonizacijo varstva človekovih pravic v evropskem prostoru.

Keywords

človekove pravice;varstvo človekovih pravic;harmonizacija;Evropska unija;EU;Lizbonska pogodba;Svet Evrope;Evropska konvencija o človekovih pravicah;EKČP;Evropsko sodišče za človekove pravice;ESČP;Sodišče Evropske unije;Sodišče EU;magistrske diplomske naloge;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization: UL PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher: [M. Petrovič]
UDC: 342.7:341.645(4-6EU)(043.2)
COBISS: 15908433 Link will open in a new window
Views: 1477
Downloads: 601
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: Relations between the Court of Justice of the EU and the European Court of Human Rights
Secondary abstract: The master thesis relates to the relations of the two very burdensome international courts - the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights. Both courts operate under two different systems, which have a common point, the protection of human rights. Although the original objectives of the EU were mostly economic, later the need for action beyond the originally set goals appeared. The Court of Justice of the EU has enormously contributed to the protection of human rights within the European Union through its judicial activism, while the Council of Europe and its most important institution the Court of Human Rights have been aiming at protection of human rights from the very beginning. Although the current human rights regulation is satisfactory, its biggest disadvantage is that it is not systematically regulated, which means that the same rights can be regulated differently in different sources and consequently controlled by the organs of different organizations. With the aim of harmonizing human rights regulation, the European Union has begun to think about accession to the European Convention on Human Rights a few decades ago. Despite the explicit commitment to accession, the realization of the latter has not yet taken place. At the end of 2014, the European Court of Justice rejected the long-awaited and broadly approved draft of Accession Agreement. By many unexpected decision of the Court has triggered a wave of negative thoughts and speculations about how the trend of coherent action and leniency between the courts will develop in the future. In my master thesis titled Relations between the Court of Justice of the EU and the European Court of Human Rights I discuss the development of human rights in the European Union, the relations between the courts themselves and the harmonization of the protection of human rights in the European area.
Secondary keywords: human rights;protection of human rights;European Union;EU;Treaty of Lisbon;Council of Europe;European Convention on Human Rights;ECHR;European Court of Justice;ECJ;European Court of Human Rights;ECtHR;harmonization of the protection systems;
Type (COBISS): Master's thesis/paper
Study programme: 0
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE): 1970-01-01
Thesis comment: Univ. v Ljubljani, Pravna fak.
Pages: IV, 48 f.
ID: 10914901