Primerjava izbranih teoretičnih modelov pravljice

diplomsko delo

Kaja Boštjančič (Author), Urška Perenič (Mentor)

Abstract

V diplomskem delu kritično obravnavam in med seboj primerjam opredelitve pravljic in njene klasifikacije ter poskušam podati sintezno definicijo te literarne vrste. Na kratko so predstavljeni teoretski modeli preučevanja pravljic, kot jih navaja Milena Mileva Blažić (2008): sociološki, literarni, psihoanalitični, folkloristični in poststrukturalistični pristop, podrobneje pa sta predstavljena strukturalistični in feministični model, ki sta na podlagi analize pravljice tudi med seboj primerjana. Prišla sem do ugotovitev, da definicije le na splošno opredeljujejo pravljico in pri tem izpostavljajo elemente, ki so sicer v središču posameznih teoretskih modelov. O tem pričajo podobnosti med njimi. Teoretski modeli pa se pri opredelitvah bolj usmerjajo vsak v svojo smer, imajo različna težišča in fokuse (sociološkega zanima pomen družbe, literarnega predvsem vsebina itd.). Na podlagi analize sodobne pravljice sem tudi prišla do spoznanja, da sta strukturalistični in feministični pristop povsem različna, saj enega zanima predvsem struktura pravljice, drugega pa ženski liki in njihova psiha. Na podlagi te razlike sem na koncu podala dve različni definiciji omenjene literarne vrste, in sicer kot bi jo definirala strukturalistični in feministični pristop.

Keywords

literarna teorija;pravjica;teortski modeli;strukturalistični pristop;feministični pristop;bolonjske diplome;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2017
Typology:	2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:	UL FF - Faculty of Arts
Publisher:	[K. Boštjančič]
UDC:	82.0-34
COBISS:	65264738
Views:	1073
Downloads:	315
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary abstract:	In this diploma thesis, we critically discuss and compare different definitions of fairy-tales and their classifications, while trying to provide a definition synthesis of this literary type. We concisely provided theoretical models of studying fairy-tales, and as Milena Mileva Blažić (2008) points out these are: the sociological, the literary, the psychoanalytical, the folkloric and post-structuralist approach, whereas the structuralist and feministic model are presented in detail (the latter two are on the basis of fairy-tale analysis compared with each other as well). I have come to the conclusion that definitions just define the fairy-tale in general, whilst accentuating elements which are at the centre of a particular theoretic model. Similarities between them confirm this claim. However, theoretical models aim at singular directions in their definitions, have diverse focal points and focusses (the sociological is concerned with the meaning of society, the literary with the content, etc.). Based on the analysis of the modern fairy-tale, I have adjudged that the structuralist and the feminist approach are entirely dissimilar, since one is interested primarily in the structure of the fairy-tale and the other in female characters and their psyche. On account of this distinction, I ultimately provided two different definitions of this literary type, as defined by the structuralist and the feminist approach respectively.
Type (COBISS):	Bachelor thesis/paper
Thesis comment:	Univ. v Ljubljani, Filozofska fak., Oddelek za slovenistiko
Pages:	29 f.
ID:	10915019