Didaktične motivacijske spodbude pri pouku kemije

magistrsko delo

Alisa Delić (Author), Iztok Devetak (Mentor), Mojca Juriševič (Co-mentor)

Abstract

Učna motivacija je posebna vrsta motivacije, ki se prek vedenja učencev odraža v kontekstu šolskega učenja. Je izredno pomemben dejavnik učenja, saj aktivira učni proces in ga nato usmerja do cilja. Glede na teorijo samodoločanja je učence k učenju mogoče spodbuditi k bolj avtonomni obliki na katerikoli točki kontinuuma zunanje motivacije, če uporabimo ustrezne pedagoške pristope. Različne pedagoške pristope lahko glede na dihotomijo med zunanjo in notranjo motivacijo razdelimo na notranje in zunanje motivacijske spodbude. Glede na pouk in neodvisno od zunanje in notranje motivacije pa jih lahko razdelimo tudi na didaktične in psihološke motivacijske spodbude. Obe vrsti se nenehno prepletata in udejanjata psihološka in pedagoško-didaktična načela pouka. Z uporabo različnih spodbud lahko pritegnemo učenčevo pozornost in/ali jo vzdržujemo. Tisto, kar učence pritegne tukaj in zdaj, imenujemo situacijski interes. Ta lahko vodi k razvoju individualnih interesov in s tem k dolgotrajnejši motiviranosti. Motivacija je pomemben del v procesu učenja in poučevanja kemije še posebej zato, ker gre za kompleksno in abstraktno vedo. Splošna motiviranost učencev za učenje kemije je običajno nizka, učenci pa imajo pogosto tudi težave z njenim razumevanjem. Kemija je zapletena predvsem zaradi narave kemijskih pojmov, ki jo lahko opišemo na makroskopski, submikroskopski in simbolni ravni. Različni pristopi poučevanja imajo pomemben vpliv na motiviranost učencev. Kemijsko izobraževanje obsega specifične didaktične prijeme, kot so eksperimentalno delo, vizualizacijska orodja (modeli, animacije, submikropredstavitve …) idr., ki lahko delujejo kot učinkovite didaktične motivacijske spodbude. Z uporabo didaktičnih motivacijskih spodbud pri pouku kemije lahko spodbudimo situacijski interes, s tem pa pripomoremo k višji motiviranosti učencev in tako tudi k njihovi učni uspešnosti. Motivacija namreč pojasnjuje približno 10 % učne uspešnosti in je ključna za to, da se učenje sploh zgodi. Glede na zaznano problematiko je bil glavni namen magistrskega dela oblikovati smernice za uporabo didaktičnih motivacijskih spodbud pri pouku kemije. S pomočjo anketnih vprašalnikov so bili na vzorcu 228 učencev 9. razredov, v povprečju starih 14,4 leta (SD = 0,38), zbrani podatki o stopnji motiviranosti učencev za učenje kemije, razlikah glede na spol in učno uspešnost v stopnji motiviranosti, pogostosti uporabe določenih didaktičnih sredstev, spodbujenem interesu učencev za učenje kemije zaradi didaktičnih sredstev, razlikah glede na spol in učno uspešnost v spodbujenem interesu, povezavi med pogostostjo uporabe in spodbujenim interesom ter povezavi med motiviranostjo in spodbujenim interesom zaradi didaktičnih sredstev. Ugotovljeno je bilo, da so učenci in učenke srednje motivirani za učenje kemije. Stopnja zunanje motivacije je nekoliko višja kot stopnja notranje motivacije. V povprečju učence najbolj motivirajo ocene. Izkazalo se je, da so učenke tako v primeru notranje kot tudi v primeru zunanje motivacije za učenje kemije bolj motivirane kot učenci. Razlike v stopnji motiviranosti so se pokazale tudi glede na učno uspešnost. Učenci, ki so učno uspešnejši, so tudi bolj notranje in zunanje motivirani. Ugotovljeno je bilo, da učitelji najpogosteje, vsako učno uro, uporabljajo »tradicionalne« učne oblike in metode. V nadaljevanju je predstavljena pogostost uporabe nekaterih didaktičnih sredstev. V povprečju je pouk vsako učno uro frontalen, enkrat na teden učenci pri pouku delajo samostojno, delo v parih in skupinah pa poteka enkrat na pol leta. Učitelji vsako učno uro razlagajo s pomočjo klasične table in tako, da se z učenci pogovarjajo. Učenci pri pouku vsako učno uro vsebine zapisujejo v zvezek. V sklopu eksperimentalnega dela učitelji enkrat na mesec do enkrat na teden učencem demonstrirajo eksperimente, enkrat na leto do enkrat na pol leta pa učenci izvajajo eksperimente samostojno, v parih in skupinah. Učitelji pri pouku približno enkrat na mesec razlagajo s pomočjo fizičnih modelov, medtem ko računalniških modelov praktično ne uporabljajo. Učenci fizičnih in računalniških modelov nikoli ne izdelujejo sami. Učitelji se pri razlagi približno enkrat na mesec poslužujejo analogij in predstavijo uporabo v vsakdanjem življenju. Enkrat na teden učitelji razlagajo na podlagi primera iz življenja in razložijo trojno naravo kemijskih pojmov. Izkazalo se je, da med vsemi didaktičnimi sredstvi, ki smo jih preverjali, le demonstracijsko in samostojno eksperimentalno delo vedno spodbujata interes učencev za učenje kemije. Med didaktičnimi sredstvi, ki pogosto pritegnejo interes učencev, so še: pogovor, eksperimentalno delo v parih in skupinah, primeri iz življenja, animacije, videoposnetki, uporaba v življenju, razlaga, slike in fotografije, delo v skupinah ter ekskurzije in drugi vodeni ogledi. Povezanost med pogostostjo in spodbujenim interesom je bila srednje močna, pozitivna le v primerih elektronske table, PowerPointa, uporabe v življenju in zgodovinskega ozadja. V primerih dela v skupini, samostojnega eksperimentalnega dela, eksperimentalnega dela v parih in skupinah ter ekskurzij in drugih vodenih ogledov je bil razkorak med pogostostjo in spodbujenim interesom zelo velik. Izkazalo se je, da se med učenci in učenkami ter med različno učno uspešnimi pojavljajo razlike v stopnji spodbujenega interesa zaradi didaktičnih sredstev. Didaktična sredstva bolj spodbujajo učenke ter tiste učenke in učence, ki so učno uspešnejši. Nazadnje je bilo ugotovljeno, da je stopnja spodbujenega interesa za učenje kemije zaradi didaktičnih sredstev večinoma povezana s stopnjo motiviranosti. V želji, da bi bili učenci ustrezno naravoslovno pismeni, ob tem pa za učenje kemije motivirani in navdušeni, so bile oblikovane smernice za uporabo didaktičnih motivacijskih spodbud pri pouku kemije, ki bi bile učiteljem v pomoč pri oblikovanju učinkovitih strategij poučevanja.

Keywords

pouk kemije;učna motivacija;situacijski interes;učna uspešnost;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2018
Typology:	2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:	UL PEF - Faculty of Education
Publisher:	[A. Delić]
UDC:	159.953:54(043.2)
COBISS:	11976009
Views:	636
Downloads:	125
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary title:	Motivational teaching in chemistry classroom
Secondary abstract:	Motivation to learn is a motivation reflected in the context of academic learning through the students' behaviour. It is an extremely important aspect of learning as it activates the learning process and furtherly directs it towards its goal. Based on the self-determination theory students can be encouraged towards a more autonomous form of learning at any given point of the continuum of extrinsic motivation, if appropriate teaching methods are being used. Based on the dichotomy of extrinsic-intrinsic motivation various teaching methods can be divided into intrinsic and extrinsic motivational stimulation. On the basis of the lesson, and independently from the extrinsic and intrinsic motivation, teaching methods can be furtherly divided into didactic and psychological motivational encouragements. Both types are constantly intertwined and actualise the psychological and didactic principles of teaching. With the use of various types of encouragements, the students' attention can be increased and attained. The situational interest is what draws the students' attention here and now. This can lead to forming of individual interest and consequently towards a long-lasting motivation. As motivation is a very important part of the learning process is it even more important in the process of teaching chemistry because it is a complex and abstract science. The overall motivation for learning chemistry is usually quite low as students deal with difficulties in understanding the subject. Chemistry is complex due to the nature of chemical concepts, which can be described on the macroscopic, submicroscopic as well as the symbolic level. The different teaching methods influence the motivation of the students to a certain degree. The chemical education encompasses specific didactic approaches such as experimental work, visualisation tools (models, animations, submicrorepresentations, etc.), which can function as efficient didactic motivational encouragements. With their use we can invoke situational interest, motivate students and consequently improve their academic achievements. Motivation namely accounts for 10% of the academic achievement and is therefore essential for learning. Based on the given issues, the main goal of this master thesis is to form guidelines for the motivational encouragement in the teaching of chemistry. The data on the level of motivation for the learning of chemistry, the differences based on sex and academic achievement, the frequency of use of various teaching methods, the interest invoked by the use of various teaching methods, and the correlation between the motivation and invoked interest due to the use of teaching methods, was collected on the sample of 228 9th graders, with the average age of 14.4 years (SD = 0.38). Based on the above mentioned data it has been concluded, that the students' motivation for learning chemistry is medium high. The level of extrinsic motivation is slightly higher than that of the intrinsic one. On average, the students are mostly motivated by grades. It was also established that the female students are, in the case of intrinsic as well as extrinsic motivation, more motivated to learn chemistry as their male peers. The differences in the level of motivation were also seen in terms of academic achievements. The more academically successful students are, more intrinsically and extrinsically motivated they are. It has been established that the teachers most frequently, that is during every lesson, use the conventional teaching styles and methods. Therefore, the frequency of use of certain teaching methods will be dealt with in the next segment. On average, every lesson is executed with the use of the frontal teaching method, once per week the students are working individually, whereas pair or group work is used once every 6 months. When discussing a new topic, the teachers normally use the traditional writing on the blackboard and discussion with students as their teaching method, and the students write in their notebooks during almost every lesson. As a part of the experimental work the teachers demonstrate various experiments to their students on a weekly or monthly basis, whereas the students execute the experiments independently in pairs or in groups only once a year or once every 6 months. Approximately once a month the teachers use models as a part of their lecture, whereas they do not use computer based models at all. The students never make models of their own as a part of their learning. Approximately once a month the teachers use analogies and examples from real life to explain certain topics. Once a week a real life example is used to explain the triple nature of chemical phenomena. It has been shown that among all of the teaching methods used in the questionnaire only demonstrational or independent experimental work always invoke the learning interest in students. Among the teaching methods which commonly invoke the students' interest are also: discussion, pair or group experimental work, real life examples, animations, videos, explanations, photographs and drawings, group work and field trips. The correlation between the frequency and the invoked interest was fairly strong and positive only in the case of the use of the electronic board, PowerPoint presentations, examples of use in real life and historic background. In the case of group work, independent experimental work, pair or group experimental work, as well as field trips, the difference between frequency and invoked interest was obvious. It has been shown, that there are differences in the degree of invoked interest due to the use of various teaching methods between female and male students, as well as between the levels of their academic achievement. The various teaching methods provide more encouragement for female students as well as for male students with higher academic achievement. Lastly, it has been therefore established that the degree of invoked interest for learning chemistry due to various teaching methods is mostly connected to the degree of motivation. Due to our interest that the students would be properly scientifically literate, motivated and eager to learn chemistry, guidelines have been created to help teachers form efficient teaching methods.
Secondary keywords:	chemistry;primary school;motivation for studies;kemija;osnovna šola;motivacija za učenje;
File type:	application/pdf
Type (COBISS):	Master's thesis/paper
Thesis comment:	Univ. v Ljubljani, Pedagoška fak., Poučevanje, Predmetno poučevanje
Pages:	61 str.
ID:	10926007