diplomsko delo univerzitetnega študijskega programa Varstvoslovje
Abstract
Vodenje je eden izmed pomembnih mehanizmov v organizaciji. Najpomembnejši za uspešno delovanje organizacije. Vodje morajo poskrbeti za uspešno opravljanje delovnih nalog, hkrati pa se dandanes vedno bolj poudarja, da dobre vodje poskrbijo tudi za osebnostno rast svojih podrejenih. »Uspešno podjetništvo zna iz priložnosti ustvariti vrednost.« (Turner, 2004, str. 72) Slabo vodstvo po drugi strani pelje organizacijo v propad. Delavci niso krivi za stečaje podjetij, marveč so žrtve le teh. V zadnjih desetletjih je propadlo mnogo velikih slovenskih firm (Mura, TAM, Prevent, Rog, Tomos, Tobačna Ljubljana, ipd.,...) ali pa so prešle v roke tujih investitorjev (Lek, Mercator, Droga Kolinska, Banka Koper, Aerodrom Ljubljana in še in še bi lahko naštevali). Ne bomo začeli omenjati slovenskih ustvarjalcev, ki so morali začeti svojo pot v tujini, ker jim naša država ni dovolila graditi, ali pa tujih investitorjev, ki so za razliko od slovenskih dobili dovoljenje za odprtje tovarn; ker to že spada v drugo področje. Kljub temu pa se tukaj odpira vprašanje: ali morda začenjamo verjeti, da so tuji vodje boljši od naših? Mar se delavcem pod njihovim vodstvom bolje godi? Tema je pomembna na našem območju (Sloveniji nasploh), saj je potrebno ugotoviti, kaj se da pri tem storiti. Kakšnega vodjo bi si zaposleni želeli nad sabo in kakšni vodje bi bili potrebni, da bi slovenske tovarne ponovno začele rasti in ne propadati.
Z raziskovalnim delom smo ugotovili, da bi slovenski delavci svoje nadrejene ocenili z oceno dobro, kar pomeni, da stanje ni tako katastrofalno, kot bi nekateri napovedali, vendar se da še veliko izboljšati. Najslabšo oceno med kompetencami, ki smo jih preverjali, so vodje dobili za socialne kompetence. Po drugi strani si delavci od nadrejenih najbolj želijo navezovanje stikov in zmožnost samokontrole.
Keywords
vodenje;teorije vodenja;uspešnost;vodje;diplomske naloge;
Data
Language: |
Slovenian |
Year of publishing: |
2018 |
Typology: |
2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis |
Organization: |
UM FVV - Faculty of Criminal Justice |
Publisher: |
[N. Korošec] |
UDC: |
005(043.2) |
COBISS: |
3561706
|
Views: |
695 |
Downloads: |
81 |
Average score: |
0 (0 votes) |
Metadata: |
|
Other data
Secondary language: |
English |
Secondary abstract: |
Leadership is one of the important mechanisms in the organisation. The most important one for the successful operation of the organization. Leaders must take care of successfully performing work tasks, while at the same time (nowadays) efficiency leaders take care also for the personal growth of their subordinates. "Successful entrepreneurship can create value from the opportunities" (Turner, 2004, str. 72). Bad leadership on the other hand leads the organization to ruin. Workers are not to blame for the bankruptcy of the companies, they are only victims of these. In the last decades many large slovenian firms has failed (Mura, TAM, Prevent, Rog, Tomos, Tobačna Ljubljana, etc.,...) or had passed into the hands of foreign investors (Lek, Mercator, Droga Kolinska, Banka Koper, Aerodrom Ljubljana and the list goes on and on). We will not begin to mention the Slovene artists, who had to start their way in a foreign country, because our country has not allowed to build them a company here, or foreign investors, that unlike the Slovenian granted permission for the opening of factories; that already belongs in another area. However, here raises the question: are we maybe starting to believe that foreign leaders are better than Slovenian leaders? Do workers take a better place under their direction? The theme is important in our area (Slovenia in general), since it is necessary to find out what to do. What kind of leader do Slovenian workers want above them; what kind of leaders would be necessary for re-growth of factories and not their collapse, as it is in custom in last years.
With the research work we found out that Slovenian workers evaluated their superiors with a rating well, which means that the situation is not as disastrous as some would predict, but there is still a lot to improve. The lowest score among the competences we have checked, the managers are getting for the social competences. On the other hand, the competences that workers want the most from their superiors are making contacts and self-control ability. |
Secondary keywords: |
leadership;leadership theories;management performance;leader; |
URN: |
URN:SI:UM: |
Type (COBISS): |
Bachelor thesis/paper |
Thesis comment: |
Univ. v Mariboru, Fak. za varnostne vede |
Pages: |
VIII, 63 str. |
ID: |
10942086 |