diplomsko delo
Alen Šabanović (Author), Valentina Hlebec (Mentor)

Abstract

Eden izmed večjih izzivov v raziskovanju je priprava anketnega vprašalnika. Ta mora zadostovati določenim pogojem, če želimo dobiti kakovostne podatke za nadaljnjo analizo. V diplomski nalogi sem se osredotočil predvsem na vsebino vprašalnika. Osnovna predpostavka neodvisnosti anketnega vprašalnika je, da vsi anketiranci razumejo vprašalnik na enak način. Ker gre za zahtevno predpostavko, se pojavi potreba po (pred)testiranju anketnih vprašalnikov. V okviru diplomske naloge sem testiral vprašalnik General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) s pomočjo metode kognitivni intervju. Uporabil sem tehniko pojasnilnih podvprašanj ter tehniko podajanja definicij z dvema pristopoma – osebni kognitivni intervju ter spletni kognitivni intervju. Različni pristopi v raziskovanju lahko prinašajo različne rezultate, kar se je v diplomskem delu potrdilo. Rezultati so pokazali, da lahko potrdimo obe hipotezi; spletni kognitivni intervju ima večje omejitve pri naboru tehnik, stopnja udeleženosti kognitivnega anketarja vpliva na razlike v rezultatih kognitivnih intervjujev. Osebni kognitivni intervjuji so v primerjavi s spletnimi intervjuji odkrili več težav z vprašalnikom.

Keywords

osebni kognitivni intervju;spletni kognitivni intervju;tehnike kognitivnega intervjuja;stopnja udeleženosti anketarja;Družboslovno raziskovanje;Metodologija;Ankete;Diplomska dela;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization: UL FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
Publisher: [A. Šabanović]
UDC: 303(043.2)
COBISS: 35688029 Link will open in a new window
Views: 893
Downloads: 470
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: Comparison of questionnaire testing techniques in personal and online cognitive interviews
Secondary abstract: Preparing the survey questionnaire is a major challenge in research. The questionnaire must meet certain requirements in order to provide quality data for further analysis. I chose the content of the questionnaire to be the main focus of my diploma paper. The basic assumption of independence of the questionnaire is that all respondents have the same understanding of the questionnaire. The boldness of this assumption creates a need for (pre-)testing the survey questionnaires. In my diploma paper, I tested the General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) using the cognitive interview method. I applied the technique of explanatory supplementary questions, and the technique of proposing definitions, using two approaches – the personal cognitive interview, and an online cognitive interview. The different research approaches can yield different results, as has been confirmed over the course of writing this paper. The results show that both of the hypotheses can be confirmed. The online cognitive interview is more limited in terms of the choice of techniques, the degree of the cognitive interviewer’s active involvement affects the different outcomes of the cognitive interview. When compared to the online interviews, more issues were identified with personal cognitive interviews.
Secondary keywords: Social science research;Methodology;Surveys;Graduate theses;
Type (COBISS): Bachelor thesis/paper
Study programme: 0
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE): 1970-01-01
Thesis comment: Univ. v Ljubljani, Fak. za družbene vede
Pages: 103 str.
ID: 10942090
Recommended works:
, ali bi kampanja "Vsi drugačni - vsi enakopravni" lahko delovala tudi med migracijsko in begunsko krizo 2015?
, pomen izbire primerov