Sodobni izzivi terorizma za kazensko pravo

kazenskopravni vidiki pregona kaznivega dejanja terorizma pred Mednarodnim kazenskim sodiščem

Ana Križaj (Author), Damjan Korošec (Mentor)

Abstract

Na Rimski konferenci je bila sprejeta odločitev, da se kaznivega dejanja terorizma v Rimski statut ne vključi, čeprav je osnutek statuta, ki ga je pripravil pripravljalni odbor, predvideval pristojnost Mednarodnega kazenskega sodišča nad terorizmom. Primarni razlog za tako odločitev je bil pomanjkanje enotne definicije terorizma, ki vse do danes še ni sprejeta, čeprav lahko ugotovimo, da obstajajo elementi, ki so skupni različnim pravnim definicijah. Nesporno mednarodna skupnost prepoznava terorizem kot grožnjo mednarodnemu miru in varnosti, zato se teoretiki sprašujejo ali kljub temu, da Rimski statut terorizma ne vključuje, obstaja možnost pregona storilcev terorističnih dejanj pred Mednarodnim kazenskim sodiščem. S spremembo Rimskega statuta bi lahko vključili terorizem kot samostojno kaznivo dejanje ali ga dodali na seznam hudodelstev zoper človečnost ali vojnih hudodelstev. Tudi brez spremembe statuta je možno preganjati teroriste pred sodiščem, v skladu z določbami o genocidu, hudodelstev zoper človečnost, vojnih hudodelstev in agresije. V tem primeru, mora teroristično dejanje izpolnjevati subjektivne in objektivne elemente hudodelstva, v okviru katerega se preganja storilce.

Keywords

terorizem;definicija terorizma;kazensko pravo;mednarodno kazensko pravo;Mednarodno kazensko sodišče;pristojnosti;Rimski statut;boj proti terorizmu;kazenski pregon;genocid;kazniva dejanja zoper človečnost;vojni zločini;agresija;zločini proti miru;magistrske diplomske naloge;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2018
Typology:	2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:	UL PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher:	[A. Križaj]
UDC:	341.48/.49(043.2)
COBISS:	16249169
Views:	1083
Downloads:	522
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary title:	Current challenges of terrorism to criminal law
Secondary abstract:	At the Rome Conference it was decided not to include the crime of terrorism in the Rome Statute, although the draft statute, which was prepared by Preparatory Committee provided the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court over terrorism. The primary reason was lack of a uniform definition of terrorism, which still has not been adopted. However we can conclude that there are common elements to different legal definitions. It is undisputed that international community recognizes terrorism as a threat to international peace and security, therefore scholars are questioning whether is possible to prosecute terrorists at the International Criminal Court despite the fact that the Rome Statute does not include terrorism. By amending the Rome Statute terrorism could be included as an independent criminal offense or added to the lists of crimes against humanity or war crimes. Even without a statute amendment it is possible to prosecute terrorists before the court in accordance with the provisions of genocide, crimes against humanity, war crimes and aggression. In this case the subjective and objective elements of the crime within the perpetrators are prosecuted must be fulfilled.
Secondary keywords:	terrorism;defining terrorism;International Criminal Court;Rome Statute;genocide;crimes against humanity;war crimes;aggression;
Type (COBISS):	Master's thesis/paper
Study programme:	0
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE):	1970-01-01
Thesis comment:	Univ. v Ljubljani, Pravna fak.
Pages:	40 f.
ID:	10942250