diplomsko delo
Martin Hrastnik (Author), Slobodan Dujić (Mentor)

Abstract

Materialno upravno pravo določa pravice in obveznosti pravnih subjektov, ki se uveljavljajo v upravnem postopku. Pomembna značilnost upravnega postopka je, da morajo organi, ki vodijo upravni postopek in odločajo v konkretnih upravnih zadevah, sočasno varovati tako javni interes kot tudi pravice posameznikov %strank oziroma fizičnih oseb in različnih pravnih subjektov. Upravni postopek je presečišče, ki naj zagotovi, da sta javni interes in zasebni interes uravnotežena. Vsak upravni postopek mora upravni organ voditi skladno s temeljnimi načeli in pravnimi pravili splošnega upravnega postopka, ki predstavljajo minimalne procesne standarde. Osrednje mesto med temeljnimi načeli ima načelo zakonitosti, ki določa, da morajo upravni organi o konkretnih pravicah in obveznostih posameznikov odločati na podlagi ustave in zakonov. Načelo zakonitosti vpliva na nastanek in razvoj pravno vezanih odločb. Pravno vezana odločba je tista, za katero je zakon ali predpis, ki temelji na zakonu, že vnaprej določil, kakšna mora biti vsebina odločbe glede na ugotovljeno dejansko stanje. V posameznih primerih iz materialnih upravnih predpisov izhaja, da je zakonodajalec upravni organ pooblastil, da o upravni zadevi diskrecijsko odloči. Upravni organ pri diskrecijskem odločanju ni pravno nevezan.Upravna odločba mora biti izdana v mejah pooblastila in v skladu z namenom, ki izhaja iz določb zakona. Diskrecijska pravica upravnemu organu omogoča, da glede na ugotovljeno dejansko stanje izbere med več pravno mogočimi odločitvami tisto, ki je, ob upoštevanju javnega interesa, najbolj ustrezna. S primerom diskrecijskega odločanja se srečamo v postopku izdaje orožne listine, ko vlagatelj zahteve navede, da orožje potrebuje zaradi ogrožene osebne varnosti. Ker iz zakona ne izhaja vsebinska konkretizacija "ogrožanje osebne varnosti", mora stranka v vlogi navesti dokaze, iz katerih izhaja, da je njegova osebna varnost ogrožena v tolikšni meri, da bi za zagotovitev svoje varnosti potreboval varnostno orožje. Upravni organ nato skrbno pretehta vsak dokaz posebej in vse dokaze skupaj v skladu s pravili upravnega postopka in diskrecijsko odloči o upravičenosti do varnostnega orožja. V primeru, da organ zavrne vlogo za izdajo orožne listine, ima vlagatelj možnost uveljaviti presojo zakonitosti diskrecijskega odločanja v obliki upravnega nadzora in sodnega nadzora.

Keywords

upravno pravo;upravni postopek;načelo zakonitosti;javni interes;diskrecija;orožna listina;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization: EVRO-PF - European Faculty of Law, Nova Gorica
Publisher: [M. Hrastnik]
UDC: 342:623.41/.42(043.2)
COBISS: 2053142966 Link will open in a new window
Views: 5513
Downloads: 280
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary abstract: Substantive administrative law establishes the rights and obligations of legal entities, which are exercised in the administrative procedure.An important feature of the administrative procedure is that the authorities that run the administrative procedure and decide on specific administrative matters must simultaneously protect both, the public interest and the rights of individualsand various legal entities. The administrative procedure is the intersection that ensuresthat the public interest and private interest are balanced. Each administrative procedure must be managed by the managing authority in accordance with the basic principles and legal rules of the general administrative procedure, which represent minimum proceduralstandards.The central place among the basic principles has the principle of legality, which stipulates that the administrative bodies must decide on the rights and obligations of individuals, based on the Constitution and laws.The principle of legality affects the emergence and development of legally binding decisions. A legally binding decision is the one for which a law or regulation based on the law has already determined in advance what the content of the decision should be based on the established facts. In individual cases it follows from the substantive administrative rules that the legislator granted the discretion to the administrative body. The administrative body is also legally bound by discretionary decision-making. The administrative decision must be issued within the limits of the authorization and in accordance with the purpose deriving from the provisions of the law. The discretion entitles the administrative body, in the light of the established factual situation, to choose between several legally possible decisions, which, having regard to the public interest, is most appropriate.With the case of discretionary decision-making, we encounter the process of issuing a weapon document, when the applicant states that he needs weapons becauseof a threatened personal safety. Since the law does not provide a substantive definition of a "threat to personal security", the applicant must provide evidence showing that his personal security is compromised to the level that he needs a safety weapon.The administrative body then weighs each evidence separately and all the evidence together in accordance with the rules of the administrative procedure and discretionally decides on the applicant's eligibility for a safety weapon. If the administrative body rejects the application for the issuance of a weapon document, the applicant has the opportunity to enforce the assessment of the lawfulness of discretionary decision-making in the form of administrative supervision and judicial supervision.
Type (COBISS): Bachelor thesis/paper
Thesis comment: Evropska pravna fak.
Source comment: Dipl. delo 1. stopnje bolonjskega študija;
Pages: VII, 55 str.
ID: 10944541