Odškodninska odgovornost za zdravniške napake

primerjava med slovenskim in italijanskim pravom

Kristina Nardin (Author), Damjan Možina (Mentor)

Abstract

Reforma Gelli-Bianco je na področju odškodninske odgovornosti za zdravniške napake v Italiji uvedla dvotirni sistem odškodninske odgovornosti za zdravniške napake. Tako sta zdravstvena ustanova zasebne ali javne narave ter zdravnik z zasebno ambulanto pogodbeno odgovorni pacientu. Zdravnik, ki pa zdravstvene storitve opravlja v okviru zdravstvene ustanove, je za napake pacientu deliktno odgovoren. V Sloveniji je, z izjemo ravnanj zdravnika v primeru nujne gestije, odgovornost za zdravniške napake utemeljena na pogodbenem temelju. Državi sta si med seboj različni tudi glede načina izračuna višine zneska odškodnine za nepremoženjsko škodo. Italijanski pravni red pozna sistem tabel, ki s pomočjo odstotnih točk določi obseg nastale škode, s pomočjo katerega se nato z uporabo tabel in upoštevanjem ostalih okoliščin določi višina odškodnine. Tabel, na katere bi se zdravnik skliceval pri določanju višine odškodnine v slovenskem pravu ni, saj se praviloma za neprmoženjsko škodo odmeri »pravična denarna odškodnina« v vsakem primeru posebej. Kljub določenim razlikam pravna reda obeh držav temeljita na istih temeljnih vrednotah, saj bi oškodovanec v primeru zdravniške napake tako v italijanskem kot slovenskem pravnem redu najbrž lahko dosegel poplačilo za škodo, ki mu je z zdravniško napako nastala.

Keywords

civilno pravo;odškodninsko pravo;pravo in medicina;zdravniške napake;zdravniška odgovornost;pogodbena odgovornost;nepogodbena odgovornost;skrbnost;dokazno breme;premoženjska škoda;nepremoženjska škoda;povrnitev škode;metoda izračuna višine odškodnine za nepremoženjsko škodo;Italija;primerjalni vidik;magistrske diplomske naloge;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2018
Typology:	2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:	UL PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher:	[K. Nardin]
UDC:	347.4/.5:61(043.2)
COBISS:	16253777
Views:	2149
Downloads:	835
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary title:	Damage liability for medical errors: Comparison between Slovenian and Italian law
Secondary abstract:	In the field of damage liability for medical errors, the Gelli-Bianco reform in Italy introduced twin-track system of damage liability for medical errors. Therefore, private or public healthcare institution and doctor with private practice are contractually liable to the patient. A doctor performing healthcare services within the healthcare institution is directly liable to the patient. With the exception of emergency action, in Slovenia responsibility for medical errors is based on the contractual foundation. The two countries also differ regarding the calculation method of the amount of compensation for non-pecuniary damage. Italian legal order has a system of tables that determines the extent of the damage incurred using percentages. Based on that and use of tables as well as considering other circumstances, the amount of compensation is determined. Slovenian legal order has no tables to which a doctor would refer to when determining amount of compensation, since, as a general rule, “fair financial compensation” is assessed for non-pecuniary damage in each individual case. Despite certain differences, legal orders of both countries are based on the same fundamental values, as the person suffering damage in case of medical error would probably obtain compensation for the damage caused by the medial error in Italian as well as Slovenian legal order.
Secondary keywords:	medical errors;medical liability;contractual liability;tort liability;professional standards;burden of proof;pecuniary loss;non-pecuniary loss;compensation of damages;calculation method of the amount of compensation for non-pecuniary loss;
Type (COBISS):	Master's thesis/paper
Study programme:	0
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE):	1970-01-01
Thesis comment:	Univ. v Ljubljani, Pravna fak.
Pages:	66 f.
ID:	10944616