magistrsko diplomsko delo
Kaja Zemljič (Author), Ana Vlahek (Mentor)

Abstract

Evropska unija kot ekonomska integracija temelji na izvajanju s Pogodbami zagotovljenih ekonomskih svoboščin, ki pa mora biti uravnotežena s socialnimi, političnimi in drugimi interesi. Magistrska diplomska naloga se ukvarja z analizo primerov iz sodne prakse Sodišča Evropske unije, ki so pomembno zasnovali razmerje med temeljnimi pravicami in svoboščinami ter temeljnimi ekonomskimi svoboščinami, in sicer primerov Schmidberger, Omega, Viking Line in Laval. Analiza primerov jasno pokaže, da Sodišče nima enotnega pristopa pri razreševanju konflikta med temeljnimi pravicami in ekonomskimi svoboščinami ter pri uporabi načela sorazmernosti. Vrhunec varstva temeljnih pravic v Evropski uniji predstavlja začetek veljavnosti Lizbonske pogodbe, ki Listini EU o temeljnih pravicah podeli veljavnost primarnega prava in omogoča pristop Evropske unije k Evropski konvenciji o varstvu človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin. Zdi se, da se kljub temu obstoječe razmerje med temeljnimi pravicami in ekonomskimi svoboščinami ne bo bistveno spremenilo. Primarna veljavnost Listine namreč zgolj utrjuje legitimnost delovanja Evropske unije. V primeru pristopa pa ni mogoče pričakovati učinkovitega nadzora nad odločitvami Sodišča Evropske unije s strani Evropskega sodišča za človekove pravice.

Keywords

temeljne pravice;človekove pravice;ekonomske svoboščine;Evropska unija;Sodišče EU;test sorazmernosti;proporcionalnost;Lizbonska pogodba;pristop EU k EKČP;Listina EU o temeljnih pravicah;magistrske diplomske naloge;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization: UL PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher: [K. Zemljič]
UDC: 347:061.1EU(043.2)
COBISS: 16264017 Link will open in a new window
Views: 1652
Downloads: 349
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: ǂThe ǂbalance between fundamental rights and fundamental economic freedoms in EU law
Secondary abstract: Economic integration of the European Union is based on the execution of Treaty guaranteed fundamental economic freedoms, which needs to be balanced with social, political and other interests. Master thesis deals with the analysis of the European Court of Justice’s case law that has profoundly shaped the balance between the fundamental rights and fundamental economic freedoms. The analysis of the following cases Schmidberger, Omega, Viking Lane and Laval clearly indicates the lack of unified approach regarding conflict resolution between fundamental rights and economic freedoms as well as the non-uniform application of the principle of proportionality. The Treaty of Lisbon represents the pinnacle of the protection of fundamental rights in the European Union while simultaneously grants the European Charter of the Fundamental Rights the validity of primary law and enables the accession of the EU to the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. It seems that despite all the effort, the existing balance between fundamental rights and fundamental economic freedoms will not change significantly. EU Charter of Fundamental Rights seems to reinforce the legitimacy of the EU. In the case of the accession of the EU to the ECHR it is impossible to expect efficient supervision by the European Court of Human Rights over the European Court of Justice’s decisions.
Secondary keywords: fundamental rights;human rights;fundamental freedoms;European Union;European Court of Justice;principle of proportionality;proportionality;Treaty of Lisbon;EU accession to the ECHR;the European Charter of the Fundamental Rights;
Type (COBISS): Master's thesis/paper
Study programme: 0
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE): 1970-01-01
Thesis comment: Univ. v Ljubljani, Pravna fak.
Pages: 43 f.
ID: 10949332