Ekonomska analiza prava in distributivna pravičnost

Abstract

Članek obravnava nekatere povezave med ekonomsko analizo prava, ki kot interdisciplinarna veda preučuje pravne norme z vidika ekonomske teorije, in vprašanjem distributivne pravičnosti, ki jo umeščamo na področje filozofije prava. Avtor poskuša definirati nekatere stične točke med problemi distributivne pravičnosti in teorijami ekonomske analize prava na primeru Coasovega teorema in pri tem opozoriti, kako se nekatere teorije ekonomske analize prava posredno ali neposredno dotikajo vprašanj distribucije dobrin in bremen v družbi. Namen avtorja je opozoriti ne nektere omejitve ekonomske analize prava. Po avtorjevem mnenju je namen ekonomske analize prava kot pomožne vede zlasti sekundarna analiza pravnih norm z vidika njihove učinkovitosti, zato ekonomska analiza prava ne more nadomestiti ukvarjanja s pravno filozofskimi problemi, ki morajo biti v ospredju pri ustvarjanju pravnega sistema ter sprejemanju in uporabi pravnih norm.

Keywords

ekonomske teorije;pravna ureditev;gospodarsko pravo;ekonomske analize;ekonomska analiza prava;distributivna pravičnost;Coasov teorem;dobrine;bremena;proizvodna sredstva;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2011
Typology:	1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:	UM PF - Faculty of Law
UDC:	340.12:330.101
COBISS:	4267819
ISSN:	1855-7147
Parent publication:	Lexonomica
Views:	772
Downloads:	86
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary title:	Economic Analysis of Law and Distributive Justice
Secondary abstract:	The author examines certain aspects of the relationship between law and economics as an interdisciplinary study and distributive justice as a problem of legal philosophy. The author tries to define certain connections between the problems of distributive justice and the economic analysis of law by examining the Coase theorem. The goal is to point out how some theories of law and economics directly or indirectly touch the subject of distributive justice. It is through this that the limitations of law and economics become evident. It is the author's opinion that law and economics form a subsidiary study that can provide mainly a secondary analysis of legal norms from the viewpoint of their efficiency. Therefore law and economics cannot substitute legal philosophy which should remain the primary focus when forming the legal system as well as through the process of adoption and use of legal norms.
Secondary keywords:	law;economics;distributive justice;distribution of wealth and burden;efficient alocation;resources;
URN:	URN:NBN:SI
Type (COBISS):	Scientific work
Pages:	str. 89-104
Volume:	ǂLetn. ǂ3
Issue:	ǂšt. ǂ1
Chronology:	jun. 2011
ID:	10949812