Aleš Ferčič (Author)

Abstract

V prispevku avtor obravnava temeljne ekonomske vidike ekscesne cene v kontekstu člena 102 PDEU, pri čemer upošteva prakso Evropske komisije, Sodišč aEvropske unije in angleškega varuha konkurence. Poudarek je na metodologiji za presojo ekonomske vrednosti opazovanega produkta in njena praktična realizacija. Avtor v tej zvezi ovrednoti prevladujočo (okvirno) formulo, kakor je bila določena v zadevi United Brands, ter ponudi izhodišča za njeno ustrezno uporabo v posamičnih primerih. Pri tem opozori na tipične napake, do katerih lahko pride zaradi posploševanja ali neupoštevanja vsakokratnih relevantnih okoliščin primera, prav tako pa se opredeli do t. i. pristopa "stroški+" in "vrednost za kupca".

Keywords

ekscesna cena;zloraba prevladujočega položaja;člen 102 PDEU;zadeva United Brands;ekonomska vrednost;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization: UM PF - Faculty of Law
UDC: 339.923:061.1EU
COBISS: 4544811 Link will open in a new window
ISSN: 1855-7147
Parent publication: Lexonomica
Views: 700
Downloads: 49
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: Economic aspects of excessive price
Secondary abstract: In this article the author deals with fundamental economic aspects of an excessive price or excessive pricing within the context of article 102 TFEU. In this regard he considers relevant practice of the European Commission, of the Court of Justice of the European Union and of the Office of fair trading. The main emphasis is on the methodology used in order to assess the economic value of a product in question, and its practical application. In this regard the author values the main stream (frame) doctrine as defined by the Court in the United Brands case. In addition, he offers guidance for its application in individual cases. By doing so, he also identifies typical errors which can be made in case of generalization or ignorance of relevant circumstances of each particular case. Last but not least, the author also values a real meaning of the “cost+” approach and the “value for a buyer”.
Secondary keywords: excessive price;abuse of a dominant position;Article 102 TFEU;case United Brands;economic value;
URN: URN:NBN:SI
Type (COBISS): Scientific work
Pages: str. 25-36
Volume: ǂLetn. ǂ5
Issue: ǂšt. ǂ1
Chronology: jun. 2013
ID: 10949911