finding an interface
Petra Hietanen-Kunwald (Author), Rikka Koulu (Author), Santtu Turunen (Author)

Abstract

As the revision process of Brussels I Regime has focused on the abolition of exequatur procedures, the interface between the Regulation and arbitration has been mostly a side note. Regardless of the fact that the systems of the Brussels I Regime and arbitration are two separate autonomous systems, overlapping issues arise. These interfaces have been discussed in the case-law of ECJ and later during the revision process. In the end, recitals elaborating the interface were added to the preamble of the Regulation, but no changes to the arbitration exclusion were introduced. The recital 12 aims to clarify how the arbitration exclusion adopted in the Regulation should be interpreted in the future. However, future case-law of ECJ is elemental to define the full meaning of the recitals.

Keywords

odločanje;pravdni postopek;sodni postopek;nepravdni postopek;arbitraža;Evropska unija;

Data

Language: English
Year of publishing:
Typology: 1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization: UM PF - Faculty of Law
UDC: 347.9:061.1EU
COBISS: 291224064 Link will open in a new window
ISSN: 1855-7147
Parent publication: Lexonomica
Views: 575
Downloads: 78
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: Slovenian
Secondary keywords: odločanje;pravdni postopek;sodni postopek;nepravdni postopek;arbitraža;Evropska unija;uredba Bruselj I;Newyorška konvencija;
URN: URN:NBN:SI
Type (COBISS): Scientific work
Pages: str. 93-114
Volume: ǂVol. ǂ8
Issue: ǂno. ǂ2
Chronology: dec. 2016
ID: 10950060