Načelo sorazmernosti v slovenski ustavnosodni praksi

magistrska naloga

Sanda Aćimović (Author), Arne Mavčič (Mentor)

Abstract

Načelo sorazmernosti je namenjeno omejevanju prekomernih posegov države v pravice posameznika. Prav tako je vodilo za zakonodajalca pri oblikovanju pravnih pravil. Sestavlja ga test legitimnosti, kjer je potrebno odgovoriti, ali je cilj, ki ga zasledujemo, ustavno dopusten. Test sorazmernosti je sestavljen iz treh vprašanj. Ali je ukrep primeren za dosego zastavljenega cilja, nujen v tej meri, da ne obstaja milejše sredstvo za dosego cilja, ter sorazmeren v ožjem smislu, ki pomeni tehtanje dveh prirejenih pravic. Načelo sorazmernosti predstavlja kriterij za reševanje ustavnih sodnih odločb. Uporaba testa sorazmernosti je obvezna za sodišča in državne organe, kadar posega na področje pravic posameznikov. Test sorazmernosti zahteva vrednotenje posameznih pravic ter zagotavlja, da pravica ne izgubi svojega bistva. Toliko bolj pride do izraza v kazenskem postopku, ko prihaja do omejevanja svobode posameznika. Ustavno sodišče ga uporablja tudi v primeru, ko prihaja do kolizije med dvema ustavnima pravicama v zasebnopravnih razmerjih. Ustavni sodniki v sklopu ustavnosodne presoje določajo vrednostna merila, na podlagi katerih je dopustno omejevanje človekovih pravic in temeljnih svoboščin.

Keywords

ustavna sodišča;ustavnosodna presoja;načelo sorazmernosti;pravna država;Slovenija;magistrske naloge;bolonjski program;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2016
Typology:	2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:	EVRO-PF - European Faculty of Law, Nova Gorica
Publisher:	[S. Aćimović]
UDC:	342.(043.2)
COBISS:	1024711281
Views:	1
Downloads:	0
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary abstract:	The principle of proportionality constitutes a restriction on excessive government intervention in the rights of an individual and guidance for the legislature in formulating legal rules. It consists of a test of legitimacy, which is necessary to answer if the objective pursues a constitutionally admissible goal. The second part represents a proportionality test that consists of three questions. The measure is appropriate to achieve the objective, necessary to the extent that there is no lesser mean to achieve the objective and proportionate in the strict sense, which means weighing two modified rights. The principle of proportionality constitutes a measure for resolving constitutional judgments. Use of the proportionality test is mandatory for courts and public authorities when there exists a restriction of individual rights. The proportionality test requires assessment of individual rights and ensures that the right does not lose its essence. This is absolutely necessary in the criminal proceedings because of the individual freedom limiting. The Constitutional Court also uses the proportionality principle in cases of conflicts between two constitutional rights in private law relationships. Constitutional Courts weigh the values under which there are permissible restrictions on human rights and fundamental freedoms.
Type (COBISS):	Master's thesis/paper
Thesis comment:	Evropska pravna fak.
Source comment:	Mag. delo 2. stopnje bolonjskega študija;
Pages:	VI f., 88 str.
ID:	10951723