magistrsko delo
Tanja Lončar (Author), Vesna Kranjc (Mentor), Jerneja Prostor (Co-mentor)

Abstract

Naročnik in izvajalec se lahko v zvezi z gradbeno pogodbo dogovorita za pogodbeno kazen, ki stranko zavezuje, da bo v primeru kršitve svoje pogodbene obveznosti nasprotni stranki plačala določen denarni znesek ali ji preskrbela drugo premoženjsko korist. Pogodbena kazen je civilna sankcija, ki zaradi svojega kaznovalnega elementa stranko odvrača od kršitve pogodbenih obveznosti. To je razlog, da dogovor o pogodbeni kazni v anglosaškem pravnem sistemu ni dopusten. V tem sistemu imajo namreč drugačno pojmovanje pogodbe in se želijo izogniti kaznovalnemu elementu v pogodbenem pravu. Novejši primeri sodne prakse so sicer to strogo tradicionalno stališče nekoliko omilili. Stranki, ki sklepata gradbeno pogodbo z mednarodnim elementom, morata biti ob sklepanju pogodbe previdni, če bosta vanjo vključili določbo o pogodbeni kazni. To velja tudi za določbo o odškodnini za zamudo, ki jo predvideva Rdeča knjiga FIDIC. Slednja predstavlja pogodbene pogoje, ki imajo pravno naravo splošnih pogojev pogodb in se v gradbeni pogodbi uporabijo, če stranki izrazita voljo za njihovo vključitev v svoje pogodbeno razmerje. Stranki morata pri dogovarjanju zneska, ki se plača v primeru kršitve pogodbenih obveznosti, jasno izraziti svoj namen – ali se želita dogovoriti za pogodbeno kazen ali morda pavšalno ali limitirano odškodnino. Posledice dogovorov so različne, še posebej, če se v primeru spora uporabi pravo iz anglosaškega pravnega sistema, kjer bo izvršljiv le dogovor, ki v primeru kršitve pogodbe predvideva znesek, ki se lahko utemelji kot resnična vnaprejšnja ocena predvidene škode, ki nastane zaradi te kršitve. Iz pogodbene klavzule se skuša – ob upoštevanju okoliščin vsakega primera – izluščiti namen strank in od prava, ki se uporabi v konkretnem primeru, bo odvisna veljavnost oz. izvršljivost takšnega dogovora. Avtonomija strank pa tudi v slovenskem pravu ni neomejena, saj ni dopusten dogovor pogodbene kazni za denarne obveznosti, sodišča pa lahko pod določenimi pogoji tudi zmanjšajo dogovorjeno višino pogodbene kazni.

Keywords

pogodbena kazen;gradbena pogodba;Rdeča knjiga FIDIC;pavšalna odškodnina;odškodnina za zamudo;common law;zmanjšanje pogodbene kazni;magistrska dela;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization: UM PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher: T. Lončar]
UDC: 347.447.8:69(043.3)
COBISS: 5641515 Link will open in a new window
Views: 2006
Downloads: 374
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: Penalty clause in construction contract (under the provisions of Code of Obligations and FIDIC Red book)
Secondary abstract: An employer and a contractor may, in respect of a construction contract, agree on a penalty clause, which obliges one party to pay a certain amount of money or provide another property benefit to another party in the event of a violation of their contractual obligation. The penalty clause is a civil sanction, which discourages the party from violating contractual obligations due to its punitive element. Therefore, the agreement on penalty clause is not admissible in the Anglo-Saxon legal system. There is a different concept of contract in this system and a penal element is to be avoided in contract law. More recent examples of the case-law have somewhat alleviated this strictly traditional attitude. Parties who conclude a construction contract containing an international element must be careful when concluding the contract if they include the penalty clause. This also applies to the delay damages clause anticipated by FIDIC Red Book. FIDIC Red Book presents contract terms that have the legal nature of the general contract conditions and are used in construction contracts if the parties express their will to include them in their contractual relationship. When negotiating an amount to be paid in the event of a violation of contractual obligations, the parties must clearly express their intention about whether they wish to agree on a penalty clause, or perhaps on liquidated damages or limited compensation. There are various differences in the consequences of the agreements, especially if the Anglo-Saxon law is applied in the case of a dispute. In such case, the only executed agreement will be the one that suggests an amount justified as a genuine pre-estimate of damages resulting from the violation of the contract. The contractual clause seeks to clarify the purpose of the parties, taking into account the circumstances of each case. Validity and execution of such agreement will depend on the applicable law. The autonomy of the parties is not unlimited in Slovenian law either, as it is not possible to agree on penalty clause for pecuniary obligation and the courts may, under certain conditions, also reduce the penalty clause.
Secondary keywords: penalty clause;construction contract;FIDIC Red book;liquidated damages;delay damages;common law;reduction of the penalty clause;
URN: URN:SI:UM:
Type (COBISS): Master's thesis/paper
Thesis comment: Univ. v Mariboru, Pravna fak.
Pages: 57 f.
ID: 10954237