(magistrsko diplomsko delo)
Maja Šadl (Author), Viktorija Žnidaršič (Mentor)

Abstract

Veliko držav se srečuje s težavami, ki so posledica uporabe klasičnega odškodninskega sistema v zdravstvu. Število odškodninskih tožb v zdravstvu narašča, kar vpliva na pojav defenzivne medicine ter negativno vpliva na odnose med zdravnikom ali drugim zdravstvenim delavcem in pacientom. Klasični odškodninski postopek je neprijazen do oškodovancev, saj je v njegovem okviru dokazovanje krivde in vzročne zveze oteženo, sodni postopki so dolgotrajni, pravdni stroški pa praviloma visoki. Zagovorniki nekrivdnega odškodninskega sistema klasičnemu odškodninskemu sistemu očitajo tudi nepravičnost, saj se v okviru slednjega oškodovancu povrne škoda le v primeru, če je zdravniku ali drugemu zdravstvenemu delavcu dokazano krivdno ravnanje. Nekatere države so se zaradi tovrstnih problemov odločile v svoj pravni red vpeljati nekrivdni odškodninski sistem v zdravstvu, v okviru katerega obstoj elementa krivde ni odločilen. V magistrskem diplomskem delu je na podlagi primerjave pravnih ureditev različnih držav, ki nekrivdni odškodninski sistem v zdravstvu poznajo, ta sistem podrobneje predstavljen. V zadnjem delu magistrskega diplomskega dela je podan opis klasičnega odškodninskega sistema v zdravstvu pri nas in težav, ki ga spremljajo. Sledi razprava o primernosti vpeljave nekrivdnega odškodninskega sistema v zdravstvu v naš pravni red, ki temelji na analizi učinkovitosti nekrivdnega odškodninskega sistema v zdravstvu pri odpravljanju obstoječih težav. Analiza nas privede do zaključka, da doprinos splošne nekrivdne odškodninske sheme ne odtehta posega v obstoječo ureditev odškodninske odgovornosti v zdravstvu ter da lahko slabosti obstoječega odškodninskega sistema odpravimo tudi z drugimi, manj invazivnimi ukrepi.

Keywords

civilno pravo;nekrivdni odškodninski sistem;klasični odškodninski sistem;odplačnost;medicinske napake;medicinski zapleti;preživljanje;magistrske diplomske naloge;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization: UL PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher: [M. Šadl]
UDC: 347:61(497.4)(043.2)
COBISS: 16381009 Link will open in a new window
Views: 1274
Downloads: 413
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: No-fault compensation system in health care and the suitabilitiy of the system in Slovenia
Secondary abstract: Many countries are facing problems that are the result of applying the classical system of compensation in health care. The number of damage claims in health care is increasing, which brings about the practice of defensive medicine and negatively affects the relationship between doctors or other health care professionals and patients. The classical system of compensation is unfavourable for the injured parties since it renders proving fault and causal relationship more difficult, while judicial proceedings are lengthy and litigation costs are generally high. Advocates of the no-fault compensation system also complain that the classical system of compensation is inequitable since, with the latter, the injured party is awarded damages only in case the doctor’s or another health care professional’s wrongful conduct is proven. Due to such issues, some countries have decided to introduce a no-fault compensation system in health care into their legal order, within which the existence of a fault element is not decisive. The master thesis presents this system in greater detail by comparing legal regulations in various countries that have adopted the no-fault compensation system in health care. The last part of the master thesis provides a description of the classical Slovenian system of compensation in health care and the problems that accompany it. This is followed by a discussion on the suitability of implementing a no-fault compensation system in health care into our legal order, which is based on the analysis of effectiveness of the no-fault compensation system in health care in overcoming the existing problems. The analysis brings us to the conclusion that the benefits of a general no-fault compensation scheme do not outweigh interfering with the existing compensation scheme in health care and that the shortcomings of the existing system of compensation can be overcome with other, less invasive measures.
Secondary keywords: no-fault compensation system;classical system of compensation;medical error;medical complication;defensive medicine;compensation;Slovenia;
Type (COBISS): Master's thesis/paper
Study programme: 0
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE): 1970-01-01
Thesis comment: Univ. v Ljubljani, Pravna fak.
Pages: VI, 39 f.
ID: 10959811