Krhkost pravičnosti

(magistrsko diplomsko delo)

Jan Košiček (Author), Mirko Nidorfer (Lector), Marijan Pavčnik (Mentor)

Abstract

Pričujoča magistrska diplomska naloga se ukvarja z vprašanjem, ali lahko pridemo do vsebine absolutne pravičnosti v pravu. Delo je sestavljeno iz treh sklopov. V prvem predstavim nekatere naravnopravne teorije pravičnosti, nato pa njihovo kritiko s strani racionalno-znanstvenega pravnega pozitivizma, ki ga predstavlja Hans Kelsen. Po tem pristopu o vsebini pravičnosti ni mogoče reči ničesar, kar bi absolutno držalo. Pravičnost, ki jo človeški razum lahko doseže, je relativna, absolutna pravičnost pa je nedosegljiv ideal. V drugem sklopu se ukvarjam z Gustavom Radbruchom, ki v pravičnosti vidi idejo prava. Po njegovem ima pravna varnost sicer prednost pred pravičnostjo, toda nevzdržno nepravično pravo se mora umakniti pravičnosti. V tretjem sklopu iščem pot spoznavanja vsebine pravičnosti. Pri iskanju pravičnega si pomagamo z vodili pravičnosti in občutkom za pravičnost. Toda vsebina pravičnosti, do katere se dokopljemo, je relativna. Na koncu se odpravim iskat vsaj minimum pravičnosti v pravu in ga najdem v temeljnih človekovih pravicah in splošnih načelih mednarodnega prava. Ti so naravno pravo v pozitivnem pravu. Na nek način lahko govorimo tudi o njihovi absolutnosti, kajti po Radbruchovi formuli se pravu, ki v njih grobo poseže, lahko odreče veljavnost, v skrajnem primeru celo narava prava.

Keywords

absolutna pravičnost;relativna pravičnost;naravno pravo;znanstveni pozitivizem;Radbruchova formula;vsebina pravičnosti;vodila pravičnosti;občutek za pravičnost;minimum pravičnosti v pravu;ideal pravičnosti;magistrske diplomske naloge;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2018
Typology:	2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:	UL PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher:	[J. Košiček]
UDC:	34(043.2)
COBISS:	16385361
Views:	897
Downloads:	307
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary title:	Fragility of justice
Secondary abstract:	The master’s thesis discusses the question of whether we can come to the content of an absolute justice in the law. The thesis is composed of the three parts. In the first part, I present some theories of the natural law and then, their criticism by the rational-scientific legal positivism represented by Hans Kelsen. According to this approach on the content of justice, it is not possible to say anything which would be absolutely true. The justice the human mind can reach is relative. Absolute justice, however, is an unreachable ideal. In the second part, I discuss Gustav Radbruch who comprehends the idea of the law in the justice. According to him, the legal safety has the advantage over the justice. However, the intolerant unjust law must withdraw before the justice. In the third part, I seek the path to understanding of the content of the justice. When seeking just, we help ourselves with the principles of justice and the sense of justice. However, the content of justice we reach is relative. In the final analysis, I go and seek at least the minimum of justice in the law and I find it in the fundamental human rights and the general principles of the international law. These are the natural law in the positive law. In a way, we can also speak about the absoluteness, as – according to the Radbruch’s formula – the law which interferes severely into them can be denied the validity, in the extreme case, even the nature of the law.
Secondary keywords:	absolute justice;relative justice;natural law;scientific positivism;Radbruchʹs formula;content of justice;principles of justice;sense of justice;minimum of justice in the law;ideal of justice;
Type (COBISS):	Master's thesis/paper
Study programme:	0
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE):	1970-01-01
Thesis comment:	Univ. v Ljubljani, Pravna fak.
Pages:	45 f.
ID:	10962324