Michel Houellebecq in arheologija sedanjosti

diplomsko delo

Sergej Harlamov (Author), Gorazd Kovačič (Mentor), Vanesa Matajc (Mentor)

Abstract

Diplomsko delo je diskurzivna analiza predzadnjega romana Michela Houellebecqa Zemljevid in ozemlje, s teoretskega gledišča sociologije in literarne teorije. Pri tem predpostavljam mimetičnost analiziranega romana in ga v skladu s to predpostavko obdelujem kot dokument našega časa. Tako zagovarjam tezo, da (v postfordističnem produkcijskem načinu) na udejstvovanje v intimnih partnerskih odnosih odločilno vpliva tržna logika, ki skozi hierarhizacijo v produkciji in iz nje izhajajočo neenako apropriacijo dobrin določa posameznikovo mesto tudi na trgu partnerstva. Arheološki pogled, uporabljen v besedilu, vsa družbena razmerja, vključno z intimnimi, povezuje z družbenim odnosi med rečmi in tako bistvo teh razmerij (kakor bistvo posameznikov, ki so del le-teh) razume zgolj kot ostanek specifične materialne kulture.

Keywords

literatura in družba;literatura in ideologija;francoska književnost;mimesis;realizem;potrošništvo;postfordizem;blagovni fetišizem;partnerski odnosi;ljubezen;bolonjske diplome;Houellebecq;Michel;1956-;"Zemljevid in ozemlje";

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2015
Typology:	2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:	UL FF - Faculty of Arts
Publisher:	[S. Harlamov]
UDC:	821.133.1.09Houellebecq M.:316.7
COBISS:	58507618
Views:	658
Downloads:	231
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary abstract:	The thesis is a discourse analysis of the penultimate novel by Michel Houellebecq The Map and the Territory from the theoretical perspectives of sociology and literary theory. As such, it presupposes mimeticism of the analysed novel and in accordance with this assumption discusses it as a document of the present time. In the thesis it is thus argued that (in the post-Fordist mode of production) the engagement in intimate partner relationships is strongly influenced by market logic, which through the hierarchisation in production and the resulting unequal appropriation of goods determines an individual's place also in the market of partnership. The archaeological view employed in the text connects all social relations, including the intimate ones, with the social relations between things and thus understands the essence of these relationships (as well as the essence of individuals who are a part of them) merely as remnants of a specific material culture.
Type (COBISS):	Bachelor thesis/paper
Thesis comment:	Univ. v Ljubljani, Filozofska fak., Oddelek za sociologijo, Oddelek za primerjalno književnost in literarno teorijo
Pages:	54 f.
ID:	10976178