magistrsko delo
Urban Brnot (Author), Maksimilijan Matjaž (Mentor)

Abstract

Deleženje ali participacija je temeljna Pavlova paradigma v pismu Rimljanom. Vendar deleženje samo po sebi še ni dobro. Pavel razlikuje med deleženjem v telesu greha in deleženjem v Kristusu. Razlikovalni element deleženja predstavlja človekov um. Vsako deleženje ima svoj lastni um: telo greha izprijeni um (1,28), medtem ko življenje v Kristusu preobraženi in prenovljeni um (12,2). Iz tega ne izvira samo človekova etična dejavnost, temveč o umu govorimo kot o središčnem organu človekove osebe, s katerim vstopa v odnos z Bogom. Deleženje v telesu greha nasprotuje Bogu, gre namreč za vrsto deleženja, v katerem smo nekoč vsi deležili. Predstavljena je univerzalnost greha, od poganov do Judov vsi deležijo v telesu greha. Telo greha ima tudi svoje lastne sadove (sadovi mesa), katerih cilj je smrt. Po postavi dobi telo greha še večjo oblast nad ljudmi. Pavel to postavo imenuje postava greha in smrti. Ključni prelom s telesom greha se zgodi z nastopom Odrešenika, Jezusa Kristusa. Tisti, ki so namreč s Kristusom umrli in bili pokopani, so stopili na pot novega življenja, ki v prvi vrsti predstavlja odmrtje grehu. Verniki so resnično odmrli grehu in zaradi tega ne morejo več živeti v njem. Sedaj živijo za Boga, v Kristusu Jezusu. Sedanji vidik deleženja v Kristusu je trpljenje s Kristusom, ki ga osmišlja Duh. Pridobitev Duha je cilj krščanskega življenja, ki pa je lahko samo dar. Prav Duh je tisti dar novega veka, ki se pojavi s Kristusom. Boj med mesom in Duhom moramo razumeti v odrešenjsko-zgodovinskem smislu kot dve moči različnih vekov. Duh je predvsem predmet eshatološkega deleženja v Kristusu s svojimi sadovi, ki vključujejo vstajenje in končno poveličanje sedanjega umrljivega telesa.

Keywords

deleženje;um (nous);telo greha (greh);v Kristusu;s Kristusom;postava (Tora);postava Duha;smrt;vstajenje;teocentrični pogled;malikovanje;poželenje;magistrske naloge;Paulus;svetnik;NUK;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization: UL TEOF - Theological Faculty
Publisher: [U. Brnot]
UDC: 27-277-248.42-31(043.2)
COBISS: 8035418 Link will open in a new window
Views: 982
Downloads: 313
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: "In Christ" in Paul's Letter to the Romans: participation in the body of sin and real participation in Christ
Secondary abstract: The fudamental dynamic in understanding "participation" in Paul is, that participation isn’t always good. There is nothing intrinsicaly good about cooperating as such. In fact, in Paul’s account of sin, he describes precisely such an immoral ethic. Parallel to his clear description of participation in Christ and the mind of Christ, there is an account of participation in sin, the Body of sin and its "debased mind" (1,28). The Body of sin also functions as a rival unity, a perverse system of participation. This is sin’s role in Romans. How do we properly engage the nous (mind) or choose rationally, present the fundamental question of participation. Universality of sin demands universality of salvation. The Body of sin contains works of the flesh. Works or fruits of the flesh are in direct contrary against God. They are mortal inasmuch as it is subject to sin and therefore subject to death, the consort of sin. Sin rules under the law and present the law of sin and death. Dominion of Christ and participation in Christ condemned the Body of sin. Everyone, who participate in Christ, really live for God, in Jesus Christ. Present view of participation in Christ is suffering with Christ, where the central role present the Spirit. Gift of Spirit is primary goal in Christian life. The belivers have set their minds on the ways of the Spirit, which is precisely what makes them so incompatible with life in the flesh. Belivers must be transformed by the renewing of their minds (nous) by the Spirit, who present the eshatological dimensions of new life.
Secondary keywords: participation;nous (mind);body of sin (hamartia);in Christ;with Christ;law (Torah);law of the Spirit;death;resurrection;theocentric view;idolatry;lust;Biblia;N. T.;Ad Romanos;Interpretacija;
Type (COBISS): Master's thesis/paper
Study programme: 0
Thesis comment: Univ. v Ljubljani, Teološka fak.
Pages: VIII, 111 str.
ID: 10994677