(magistrsko diplomsko delo)
Luka Hribernik (Author), Franc Grad (Mentor)

Abstract

Pravni red EU na zapleten način združuje tako značilnosti države kot značilnosti mednarodne organizacije. Tako je moč reči, da ima Unija dvojno pravno naravo, ki poizkuša istočasno zadostiti interesom držav članic po ohranitvi suverenosti kot tudi interesom “vedno tesnejše zveze” med članicami. Posledično se EU izmika opredelitvam ustaljenih teoretičnih modelov federacije ali konfederacije in se ponavadi v literaturi opredeljuje kot “sui generis” tvorba. V nalogi predstavim, kako se je razvijala dvojna pravna narava Unije in kako so se postopoma krepili federalni elementi v njenem ustavnem ustroju. Zgodovinski pogled je dopolnjen z raziskavo federacij in konfederacij kot pravnih oblik, ter identifikacijo elementov ustavne ureditve EU, ki ustrezajo bodisi eni bodisi drugi obliki povezovanja. Prav tako so posebej predstavljena temeljna načela EU, ki jih je moč primerjati s federalnimi načeli v zveznih državah. Naloga nadalje tudi podrobneje razišče vlogo Sodišča EU v ustavnem razvoju Unije in primerja njegov položaj s pozicijo ustavnih sodišč v zveznih državah. Končna ugotovitev bo, da je trenutna hibridna narava Unije neoptimalna, saj povzroča pomanjkljivosti tako z vidika demokratičnosti in transparentnosti kot tudi z vidika učinkovitosti njenega delovanja. Kot najbolj smiselna dolgoročna rešitev se zato ponuja postopna končna preobrazba Unije v federacijo.

Keywords

predsedniki;Evropska unija;Lizbonska pogodba;federacija;konfederacija;evropska ustava;evropsko ustavno pravo;demokratični primankljaj;združene države Evrope;magistrske diplomske naloge;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization: UL PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher: [L. Hribernik]
UDC: 342:061.1EU(043.2)
COBISS: 16579153 Link will open in a new window
Views: 657
Downloads: 234
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: The strengthening of federal elements in the European Union
Secondary abstract: The legal order of the EU combines both the features of a state as well as the features of an international organisation in a complex and novel way. It has a dual legal nature, because it tries to satisfy the interests of the member states in retaining sovereignty in conjunction with pursuing the combined interest of the states of creating an “ever closer union”. As a result, the EU eludes the standard theoretical models of either a federation or a confederation and is instead famously characterised as a “sui generis” polity. In this thesis I therefore present the development of the dual legal nature of the Union and the gradual strengthening of federal elements within its constitutional structure. This historical view is complemented by an examination of federations and confederations as legal forms. With this analysis the various elements of the constitutional structure of the EU that correspond to either of the two legal forms are identified. In addition, the constitutional principles of the Union are presented and compared with federal principles found in federations. The role of the Court of the EU in the constitutional development of the Union is also examined and its position compared to the position of constitutional courts in federal states. In conclusion it will be shown, that the current hybrid nature of the Union is sub optimal, leading to deficiencies from the points of view of democracy and transparency as well as efficiency. The gradual final transformation of the Union into a federation is presented as the most viable long term solution.
Secondary keywords: European Union;federalisation Lisbon Treaty;federation;confederation;Constitutional Treaty;EU constitutional law;democratic deficit;United States of Europe;
Type (COBISS): Master's thesis/paper
Study programme: 0
Thesis comment: Univ. v Ljubljani, Pravna fak.
Pages: 39 f.
ID: 10994949