Language: | Slovenian |
---|---|
Year of publishing: | 2018 |
Typology: | 2.08 - Doctoral Dissertation |
Organization: | UL PF - Faculty of Law |
Publisher: | [S. Sever] |
UDC: | 34(043.3) |
COBISS: | 16498513 |
Views: | 1466 |
Downloads: | 379 |
Average score: | 0 (0 votes) |
Metadata: |
Secondary language: | English |
---|---|
Secondary title: | Effect of fundamental rights between individuals in the European Union law |
Secondary abstract: | Recent judgments of the ECJ in the cases Mangold, Kücükdeveci, AMS and Egenberger show that general principles of EU law and provisions of the Charter of fundamental rights of the European Union can have horizontal direct effect. The granting of horizontal direct effect to the Charter is remarkable. Fundamental rights are normally means to protect private individuals vis-à-vis public authorities. Within the international and national legal orders, the horizontal direct effect of fundamental rights is not common. In this paper this legal institute will be analysed and discussed in relation to the chapter on »Solidarity« of the Charter. This research is based on the hypothesis that the predominant interest – the primacy of the European Union law over national law – which is pursued by this legal institute does not affect in a disproportionate manner the principle of interinstitutional balance and the principle of legal certainty. |
Secondary keywords: | European Union law;general principles of law;Charter of fundamental rights of the European Union;horizontal direct effect of the Charter;case-law of the Court of Justice of the European Union; |
Type (COBISS): | Doctoral dissertation |
Study programme: | 0 |
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE): | 1970-01-01 |
Thesis comment: | Univ. v Ljubljani, Pravna fak. |
Pages: | 270 str. |
ID: | 10999835 |