Mitjan Kalin (Author), Aljaž Pogačnik (Author), I. Etsion (Author), B. Raeymaekers (Author)

Abstract

Understanding contact between rough surfaces is of critical importance to the design of many engineering applications. Contact models rely on material properties and surface topography of the contacting surfaces as input parameters. Hence, the relevance of the contact models is dependent on their inherent assumptions and the accuracy with which the input parameters are determined. We have evaluated the difference between the surface topography parameters calculated with a statistical and deterministic approach for actual engineering surfaces. We have found topography values that change up to 300% depending on the method used, and attribute this to the stringent definition of an asperity-peak in the case of deterministic analysis as opposed to statistical analysis, which not only considers asperity-peaks but also asperity-shoulders.

Keywords

surface topography;spectral moments;deterministic analysis;

Data

Language: English
Year of publishing:
Typology: 1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization: UL FS - Faculty of Mechanical Engineering
UDC: 620.1(045)
COBISS: 14288923 Link will open in a new window
ISSN: 0301-679X
Views: 1560
Downloads: 785
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: Slovenian
Secondary keywords: topografija površin;spektrarni momenti;deterministične analize;
Type (COBISS): Article
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE): 2019-09-14
Pages: str. 137-141
Volume: ǂVol. ǂ93
Issue: ǂpt. ǂA
Chronology: Jan. 2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.triboint.2015.09.013
ID: 11053096
Recommended works:
, zaključna naloga Razvojno raziskovalnega programa I. stopnje Strojništvo
, magistrsko delo magistrskega študijskega programa II. stopnje Strojništvo
, diplomsko delo visokošolskega študija