Asimetrično bojevanje

lastnosti treh glavnih indikatorjev vietnamske vojne

Enej Radelj Šemrov (Author), Vladimir Prebilič (Mentor)

Abstract

Vojna, stanje med družbami, narodi in državami, ki je že od antike naprej globoko zasidrana v človeško zgodovino. Gre za agresijo med oboroženimi in gverilskimi silami več strani v spopadu, ki pa ne razpolagajo vedno z istimi sredstvi, kadrom, usposobljenostjo. Čeprav je pojem asimetrija pri bojevanju svež izraz v stroki, je treba vedeti, da vojne in oboroženi spopadi niso bili nikoli simetrični v vseh pogledih; asimetrija se je pojavljala bodisi v št. vojakov, oborožitvi, logistiki, bodisi v strategijah, taktikah samega bojevanja. Druga Indokitajska vojna, ki je v 60. letih prejšnjega stoletja prerasla v popolnoma vietnamsko vojno med Združenimi državami Amerike in Severnim Vietnamom, je zanimiv in oči odpirajoč primer, ki kaže, da lahko mehansko superiorna stran izgubi vojno proti šibkejšemu nasprotniku, čeprav prva razpolaga z veliko večjo ognjeno močjo. V diplomski nalogi sem raziskoval vprašanje asimetričnosti v vietnamski vojni. Za dosego tega sem izbral tri indikatorje, ki sem jih preučil. Nadaljeval sem z raziskovanjem kritičnih točk, ko so ZDA pričele izgubljati vojno, katere ključne lastnosti v asimetriji vojne so vplivale na to, kaj se je v kronološkem zaporedju takrat dogajalo in kako je to vplivalo na potek vojne.

Keywords

Vietnamska vojna (1961-1975);Asimetrično vojskovanje;Gverilsko vojskovanje;Diplomska dela;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2019
Typology:	2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:	UL FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
Publisher:	[E. Radelj Šemrov]
UDC:	355.4(043.2)
COBISS:	36362589
Views:	644
Downloads:	135
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary title:	Asymmetric warfare: properties of the three main indicators of the Vietnam War
Secondary abstract:	War, a state between societies, nations, and modern countries, which has been rooted in human history since the antique. It is aggression among armed and guerrilla forces of multiple sides in an armed conflict which rarely possess symmetrical equipment, manpower or level of training. Although asymmetric warfare is a somewhat fresh expression, it is important to understand that not a single war or armed conflict has even been completely symmetric. Asymmetry showed itself in manpower, equipment, logistics, strategies or tactics used. The Second Indochina War, which turned into a Vietnam War between United States of America and North Vietnam 1960s, is an interesting and eye-opening example which shows us that even a mechanically superior party in a conflict can lose to a much weaker opponent, even if the first operates with a far superior firepower than the latter. My bachelor’s thesis is a research of asymmetry of the Vietnam War. To achieve that it was crucial for me to select three indicators to study. Further, I researched crucial points at which the U. S. began to lose the war and which properties in the asymmetry of the war influenced the chronology of the events that occurred at the time of the war.
Secondary keywords:	Vietnam War (1961-1975);Asymmetric warfare;Guerrilla warfare;Graduate theses;
Type (COBISS):	Bachelor thesis/paper
Study programme:	0
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE):	1970-01-01
Thesis comment:	Univ. v Ljubljani, Fak. za družbene vede
Pages:	54 str.
ID:	11199164