Medverski dialog in (po)nov(n)a evangelizacija v Sloveniji

Abstract

V razpravi je izpostavljenih nekaj vidikov medverskega dialoga, ki je po 2. vat. c. z. postavljen v okvir nove evangelizacije; s tem se postavlja vprašanje, ali je ʺsredstvoʺ v procesu evangelizacije ali ima vrednost sam v sebi. Od koncilske odprtosti drugim verstvom, ki jo je precej jasno nakazal papež Pavel VI. v encikliki Ecclesiam Suam med kocilom samim, je v razpravi prikazan nadaljnji razvoj s primeri teoloških razpravljanj na simpozijih in kongresih, kar je premislek uvrstilo tudi na sinodo škofov v Rimu leta 1974, kjer se je začutila spet neka zadržanost. Delno jo je premagala že papeževa posinodalna spodbuda Evangelii Nuntiandi, še bolj pa papeži bl. Janez Pavel II., Benedikt XVI. in Frančišek, ki so medverskemu dialogu tako v teoriji kot v praksi dali nov polet. Drugi del razprave prikazuje to problematiko v Sloveniji. Do osamosvojitve Slovenije ni bilo vidnejšega medverskega dialoga; z večjo versko svobodo se je nato pričel in se najbolj uresničeval v zagovarjanju skupnih vrednot v odnosu do zakonodaje, manj je bilo znanstvenih posvetovanj in medverskih srečanj. Zanimiva je ugotovitev, da je bila tematika dialoga šibko prisotna v procesu plenarnega zbora. Najšibkejši je bil dialog na področju medsebojnega spoznavanja o tipično verskih vprašanjih. Zato ostaja prav to področje največji izziv za prihodnost.

Keywords

medverski dialog;islam;nova evangelizacija;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2013
Typology:	1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization:	UL TEOF - Theological Faculty
UDC:	2-675(497.4)
COBISS:	9967619
ISSN:	2335-4127
Parent publication:	Edinost in dialog
Views:	485
Downloads:	228
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary title:	Interreligious dialogue and repeated (new) evangelization in Slovenia
Secondary abstract:	In this paper, some aspects of the interreligious dialogue, which has found its place after the Second Vatican Council withing the framework of the New Evangelisation, are emphasised. Hence, the question arises whether it is only ʺan instrumentʺ in the process of Evangelisation or has its own inherent value. Beginning with the openness of the council towards other religions, which was emphasised very clearly by the Pope Paul VI in his encyclical Ecclesia Suam during the Council itself, this paper analyses further developments, citing examples of theological discussions from various symposia and congress. Interreligious dialogue was also a topic at the Synod of Bishops in 1974, where a kind of restraint was felt again. It was partly overrode already by the Popeʼs post-synodal exhortation Evangelii Nuntiandi, but even more by activities of the Blessed Popes John Paul II, Benedict XVI and Francis, who gave interreligious dialogue new power, both theoretically and practically. The second part of the paper depicts the development of the interreligious dialogue in Slovenia. Before the state independence of our country, it was not very visible. Encouraged by the greater religious freedom after 1991, it made important progress and mainly been realised by championing the same common values regarding legislation, but there have been significantly fewer scientific deliberations and interreligious meetings. It is interresting to observe that the topic of dialogue was weakly represented during the process of the Plenary Council. The religious dialogue in the area of the mutual spreading of knowledge regarding typically religious questions has been even weaker. Therefore, it is exactly this area remains the greatest challenge for the future.
Secondary keywords:	interreligious dialogue;Islam;new evangelization;
URN:	URN:NBN:SI
Type (COBISS):	Article
Pages:	str. 23-40
Volume:	ǂLetn. ǂ1 (68)
Issue:	ǂšt. ǂ1/2
Chronology:	2013
ID:	11203461