Primerjava podpore diagramom aktivnosti v modelirnih orodjih

diplomsko delo

Jan Retko (Author), Marjan Heričko (Mentor), Gregor Jošt (Co-mentor)

Abstract

Namen diplomskega dela je bil spoznati vse gradnike diagramov aktivnosti in preveriti, v kolikšni meri so le-ti podprti v izbranih modelirnih orodjih. Na osnovi sorodnih del smo oblikovali seznam kriterijev za primerjavo orodij, s pomočjo katerega smo ovrednotili orodji VisualParadigm in StarUML. Ugotovili smo, da se orodji znatno razlikujeta glede števila podprtih elementov, pri čemer pa obe orodji zagotavljata dobro podporo za večino najpogosteje uporabljenih gradnikov. Slednje potrjujejo tudi rezultati, ki smo jih pridobili pri izdelavi diagramov aktivnosti za primere na področju modeliranja poslovnih procesov, visokonivojskega opisa programskih procesov in za predstavitev in načrtovanje algoritmov. Obe orodji sta se izkazali kot primerna izbira tudi glede ostalih kriterijev, kot so krožno inženirstvo, preverjanje sintakse, uvozi in izvozi, izdajanje novih verzij, robustnost, podpora za več uporabnikov, pregledovanje, zahteve in podpora.

Keywords

informacijski sistemi;modeliranje;jezik UML;diagrami aktivnosti;modelirna orodja;diplomske naloge;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2019
Typology:	2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization:	UM FERI - Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
Publisher:	[J. Retko]
UDC:	004.4'23-051(043.2)
COBISS:	22817302
Views:	678
Downloads:	65
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary title:	Comparison of activity diagram support in modeling tools
Secondary abstract:	The purpose of diploma thesis was to get to know all the activity diagram constructs and to see to what extent they are supported in the selected modeling tools. Based on related works, we have compiled a list of benchmarking tools to evaluate VisualParadigm and StarUML. We found that the tools differ significantly in the number of supported items, but both tools provide good support for most commonly used constructs. The latter are also confirmed by the results obtained in the production of activity diagrams for examples in the field of business process modeling, high-level description of program processes, and for the presentation and design of algorithms. Both tools also proved to be suitable choices for other criteria such as code engineering, syntax checking, imports and exports, new releases, robustness, multi-user support, browsing, requests and support.
Secondary keywords:	information systems;modeling;UML language;activity diagrams;modeling tools;
Type (COBISS):	Bachelor thesis/paper
Thesis comment:	Univ. v Mariboru, Fak. za elektrotehniko, računalništvo in informatiko, Informatika in tehnologije komuniciranja
Pages:	VIII, 71 str.
ID:	11223099