magistrsko diplomsko delo
Aljoša Aleksovski (Author), Peter Grilc (Mentor)

Abstract

Obveznost mirovanja prepoveduje izvedbo transakcij, ki prispevajo k trajni spremembi nadzora nad ciljnim podjetjem in skupaj z obveznostjo priglasitve predstavlja temelj sistema preventivnega nadzora koncentracij v okviru prava Evropske unije. Magistrsko delo obravnava vprašanje obsega obveznosti mirovanja, in sicer zlasti v razmerju med pojmom izvedbe in konceptom koncentracije, kot ju je izoblikovala praksa Sodišča Evropske unije in Splošnega sodišča. Izrednega pomena je pri tem sam namen suspenza koncentracij. Z analizo sodnih odločb ter odločb Evropske komisije avtor skuša najti vzporednice ter poiskati kriterije, na podlagi katerih bi bilo obveznost mirovanja smiselno presojati v prihodnje. V tem okviru je napravljen tudi poskus identifikacije meja obveznosti mirovanja, kar omogoča lažjo razmejitev uporabe uredbe št. 139/2004 in uredbe št. 1/2003 ter s tem obveznosti mirovanja napram 101. členu PDEU, s čimer se strankam postopka presoje koncentracij zagotavljata večja predvidljivost ter pravna varnost. Ob tem je zaradi nujne povezanosti z obveznostjo mirovanja v okviru sistema preventivnega nadzora koncentracij predstavljena tudi obveznost priglasitve.

Keywords

konkurenčno pravo;obveznost mirovanja;obveznost priglasitve;združitve in prevzemi;koncentracija;enotna koncentracija;nadzor koncentracij;nadzor;uredba št. 139/2004;magistrske diplomske naloge;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization: UL PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher: [A. Aleksovski]
UDC: 347(043.2)
COBISS: 16980049 Link will open in a new window
Views: 753
Downloads: 212
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: Standstill Obligation in the Mergers and Acquisitions Proceedings
Secondary abstract: Standstill obligation prohibits the implementation of transactions that contribute to lasting change in control of the target undertaking and together with duty to notify forms the foundation of the system of preventive control of concentrations within the law of the European Union. Master thesis examines the question of scope of the standstill obligation, in particular in its relationship with the term of implementation and concept of concentration, as developed through the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union and The General Court. Of vital importance is the purpose of the suspensive effect of concentrations. With the analysis of case law and decisions by the European Commission, the author seeks to find parallels and criteria that should form a basis for the future approach to the standstill obligation. Within this scope, an attempt to identify the limits of the standstill obligation is made, so as to ease the delimitation between the applicability of Regulation No 139/2004 and Regulation No 1/2003, and with it between the scope of the standstill obligation and Article 101 TFEU, which shall ensure the parties to the proceedings with greater sense of predictability and legal certainty. Due to the necessary connection with the standstill obligation within the scope of the system of preventive control of concentrations, a duty to notify is also presented.
Secondary keywords: competition law;standstill obligation;duty to notify;mergers and acquisitions;concentration;single concentration;control of concentrations;Regulation No 139/2004;
Type (COBISS): Master's thesis/paper
Study programme: 0
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE): 1970-01-01
Thesis comment: Univ. v Ljubljani, Pravna fak.
Pages: 50 f.
ID: 11223562