Pogodba o dosmrtnem preživljanju

(magistrsko diplomsko delo)

Jure Dragan (Author), Viktorija Žnidaršič (Mentor)

Abstract

Magistrsko diplomsko delo v prvem delu predstavlja poglobljen in kritičen pregled ureditve pogodbe o dosmrtnem preživljanju, tako z vidika teorije, kot prakse. V nadaljevanju obravnava različne problemske sklope, ki so se ali bi se lahko pojavili v praksi. Ob podrobni analizi so predstavljene možne rešitve, ki bi pripomogle k odpravi dilem v praksi. Pogodba o dosmrtnem preživljanju je obligacijskopravna pogodba, ki ustvarja obveznosti za obe pogodbeni stranki. V praksi se jo pogosto označuje kot pogodbo, katere namen je, da se osebi oziroma osebam, praviloma starejšim, zagotovi preživljanje in pomoč v njihovi starosti, preživljavec pa v zameno dobi določeno premoženje, ki obstaja v trenutku sklepanja pogodbe. Ne glede na njeno, sicer dokaj nesporno izhodišče, pogodba o dosmrtnem preživljanju v svojem bistvu skriva lastnosti, ki so z vidika obligacijskega prava posebne. Pogodba je odplačne narave, pa vendar odplačnost ne zajema gole ekonomske komutativnosti, saj vsebuje tudi elemente aleatornosti in subjektivnosti oziroma osebno naravo medsebojnega razmerja. Posebnosti obravnavane pogodbe so bile v teoriji predmet številnih razprav, v praksi pa predmet različnih interpretacij. V okviru magistrskega diplomskega dela so poleg pregleda veljavne pravne ureditve v Republiki Sloveniji predstavljeni tudi navedeni problemski sklopi. Na koncu sledijo avtorjevi predlogi na zastavljena problemska vprašanja, katerih večino, vendar ne vseh, je mogoče implementirati že zgolj z ustrezno sodniško interpretacijo veljavnega prava.

Keywords

pogodba o dosmrtnem preživljanju;preživljavec;preživljanec;aleatornost;subjektivna prvina kavze;dedovanje razmerja po pogodbi o dosmrtnem preživljanju;dedno pravo;pogodbeno pravo;magistrske diplomske naloge;

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2019
Typology:	2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:	UL PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher:	[J. Dragan]
UDC:	347(043.2)
COBISS:	16970833
Views:	1082
Downloads:	288
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary title:	Life care contract
Secondary abstract:	In the first part this master thesis presents an in-depth critical review of the law, which regulates the Life Care Contract, both in terms of theory and judicial practice. In the continuation, the thesis deals with various problems, which have occurred or might occur in judicial practice. In a detailed analysis, possible solutions are presented to help eliminate the dilemma in practice. The Life Care Contract is a contract which creates obligations for both parties. In judicial practice, the contract is often proclaimed as a contract, the purpose of which is to provide, especially to the elderly, life care and an old age support. The maintaining party, in return, receives certain property that exists at the time of the conclusion of the contract. Regardless of its rather undisputable starting point, the Life Care Contract in its essence hides the characteristics that are specific in terms of obligatory law. The contract is not lucrative only by its economic commutative nature, as it also contains the aleatory elements and the elements of subjectivity or the personal nature of the relationship. The specific features of the contract have been the subject of numerous debates in theory and the subject of many interpretations in judicial practice. Within the framework of this master thesis, in addition to the review of the current legal regulation in the Republic of Slovenia, the problem sets are presented. At the end, there are the author’s suggestions to the questions raised, the majority of which, but not all, could be implemented merely by appropriate judicial interpretation of the applicable law.
Secondary keywords:	life care contract;the maintaining party;the maintained party;aleatory nature;subjective component of permissible basis;inheritance of life care contract obligation relationship;
Type (COBISS):	Master's thesis/paper
Study programme:	0
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE):	1970-01-01
Thesis comment:	Univ. v Ljubljani, Pravna fak.
Pages:	VI, 54 f.
ID:	11233665