diplomsko delo
Maša Mlakar (Author), Slobodan Dujić (Mentor)

Abstract

Razmerje med upravnim pravom in sodstvom je razmerje med avtonomno izvršilno in avtonomno sodno oblastjo. Upravno pravo se opredeljuje kot državno sankcionirani sistem pravil in načel, ki pretežno kogentno urejajo pravice in obveznosti posameznikov in zasebnopravnih subjektov, ko obstaja dejansko ali potencialno nasprotje med javnim in zasebnim interesom. Teoretično gledano, se upravno pravo smatra kot javno pravo, kakor hitro se država pri svojem delovanju posluži svojih oblastnih sredstev v razmerju do posameznih subjektov (de iure imperii). Sodna funkcija v formalnem pogledu je tista funkcija, ki jo opravljajo sodni organi. V materialnem pogledu pa je funkcija sodstva predvsem v tem, da v konkretnem primeru določi, kateri predpis velja za konkreten primer, da torej primerja dejansko stanje z vsebino pravne norme. Exceptio illegalis je pravni institut, ki se opredeljuje kot pravica oz. dolžnost sodnika, da uporabi ta institut, če meni, da podzakonski akt, ki bi ga moral pri sojenju uporabiti, ni v skladu z ustavo ali zakonom. Poenostavljeno, podzakonskega akta ne sme uporabiti in ga mora ignorirati. Za razliko od sodnikov pa te pravice nimajo upravni organi. Pravni institut je urejen v različnih pravnih virih, gotovo najpomembnejši je Ustava Republike Slovenije, ki ta institut za sodstvo ureja v 125. členu. Za upravne organe pa je v zvezi s tem relevantna podlaga v 120. členu Ustave Republike Slovenije in v 6. členu Zakona o splošnem upravnem postopku.

Keywords

No keyword data available

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.11 - Undergraduate Thesis
Organization: EVRO-PF - European Faculty of Law, Nova Gorica
Publisher: [M. Mlakar]
UDC: 340.131:347.99(497.4)(043.2)
COBISS: 2048003556 Link will open in a new window
Views: 92
Downloads: 26
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary abstract: The relation between the administrative law and the judiciary is a relation between an autonomous executive and an autonomous judicial power. The administrative law is defined as a by the State sanctioned system of rules and principles, which are mostly congenially regulating the rights and obligations of individuals and subjects of private law, when there is an actual or potential contrast between public and private interests. Theoretically, the administrative law is considered as public law as soon as the State uses its authoritative resources in relation to individual subjects (de iure imperii). From the formal perspective, the judicial function is the function, carried out by judicial organs. From the material perspective, the judicial function is above all used in concrete cases to decide, which regulation applies in the concrete case, meaning that it compares the actual state with the content of the legal principle. Exceptio illegalis is a legal concept, which is being defined as a right or obligation of the judge to use the concept, if he thinks that the byelaw, which he should use in the ruling, is not in compliance with the institution or law. In other words, he is not allowed to use the byelaw and has to ignore it. Unlike judges, administrative organs do not have this right. The legal concept is regulated in different legal acts, the most important one is certainly the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia, which regulates this concept for the judiciary in article 125. The relevant basis for administrative organs can be found in article 120 of the Constitution of the Republic of Slovenia and in article 6 of the General Administrative Procedure Act.
Secondary keywords: Ustavnost;Diplomske naloge;Sodišča;Slovenija;
Type (COBISS): Final reflection paper
Thesis comment: Evropska pravna fak.
Source comment: Dipl. delo 1. stopnje bolonjskega študija; Nasl. z nasl. zaslona; Opis vira z dne 13. 9. 2019;
Pages: VII, 77 str.
ID: 11268569