doktorska disertacija
Stojan Pečlin (Author), Primož Južnič (Mentor), Franci Demšar (Co-mentor)

Abstract

V nalogi smo skušali celovito analizirati razvoj in evalvacijske postopke v raziskovalni dejavnosti od vzpostavitve samostojnosti Slovenije do danes. V prvem delu naloge smo se posvetili vprašanjem kadrovskih raziskovalnih zmogljivosti in financiranju raziskovalne dejavnosti na Slovenskem, v drugem delu pa smo se v študijah lotili znanstvene produkcije programskih raziskovalnih skupin na izbranih področjih naravoslovja, medicine in biotehnike. Poskušali smo osvetliti obe strani, "input" v raziskovalno dejavnost in znanstveno produkcijo, merjeno z objavami v periodičnih znanstvenih revijah, ob tem pa izvesti tudi primerjave v mednarodnem kontekstu, predvsem v okviru EU. Iz prikazov financiranja raziskovalne dejavnosti iz javnih virov in kadrovskih potencialov v Sloveniji so vidne relativno velike razlike med vedami in raziskovalnimi področji. Obseg kadrovskih potencialov in sredstva za znanstvenoraziskovalno delo ter njihova razdelitev so v veliki meri rezultat razvoja znanosti in znanstvene politike v Sloveniji v preteklih šestdesetih letih. Razlike so pričakovano vidne tudi pri znanstveni produkciji in odmevnosti znanstvenih rezultatov. V delu raziskave, kjer podrobno proučujemo rezultate programskih raziskovalnih skupin na izbranih raziskovalnih področj ih, smo ugotavljali obseg znanstvene produkcije in s kazalniki za merjenje odličnosti (odmevnosti) njeno kakovost. Postavili smo hipotezo, da so objave slovenskih raziskovalcev v revijah, indeksiranih v bibliografski bazi SCI, ki so objavljene v visoko rangiranih revijah, boljše citirane kot publikacije, objavljene v drugih revijah. Pričakovali smo tudi, da soavtorstvo slovenskih raziskovalcev s kolegi iz tujine močno vpliva na odmevnost znanstvenih objav. Dobljeni rezultati niso v celoti potrdili izhodiščnih hipotez. Izkazalo se je, da na rezultat pomembno vpliva zlasti razvitost posameznega raziskovalnega področja v državi. Primerjali smo tudi rezultate oziroma ocene, ki jih dajeta kvantitativno merjenje raziskovalnih rezultatov in njihovo ekspertno ocenjevanje, ter potrdili hipotezo, da je ob uporabi na mednarodnih recenzijah zasnovanega kvalitativnega ocenjevanja, ko je nasprotje interesov manjše, usklajenost med obema načinoma merjenja oziroma ocenjevanja večja.

Keywords

bibliometrijska analiza;bibliometrijski kazalniki;financiranje raziskovalnega dela;programske raziskovalne skupine;znanstvene objave;soavtorstvo;faktor vpliva revije;odmevnost;mednarodno sodelovanje;ekspertno ocenjevanje;raziskovalna politika;evalvacija;doktorske disertacije;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.08 - Doctoral Dissertation
Organization: UL FF - Faculty of Arts
Publisher: [S. Pečlin]
UDC: 001.3:001.89:655.411(497.4)(043)
COBISS: 50365538 Link will open in a new window
Views: 591
Downloads: 209
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: [Scientific production of research groups in Slovenia and impact of their publication
Secondary abstract: ln our study we tried to make a comprehensive analysis of the development and evaluation procedures in scientific research activity, since the establishment of the independent state of Slovenia till today. In the first part of the study we focused on the issues related to human resources and funding capacities for research activities in Slovenia; in the second part, we focused on scientific production of program research groups in the selected fields inc1uding natural science, medicine and biotechnology. We tried to highlight both the input in research activity and the scientific production, measured in tenns of publications in periodic scientific journals; along with this, we also tried to make comparisons in the international context, especially within the framework of the EU. Presentations of funding research activities from public resources and of research potentials in Slovenia show relatively significant differences between scientific disciplines and the research fields. The extent of research potentials and funds for scientific research work as well as their distribution are largely the result of development of science and the science policy in Slovenia in the past sixty years. As expected, there are also visible differences in scientific production and the impact of research results. In that part of the research where we studi ed in detail the results of program research groups in the selected research fields, we tried to determine the scope of scientific production, and - using excellence (impact) indicators - its quality. We set the hypothesis that the papers of Slovenian researchers in SCI-indexed journals, published in high ranking journals, are better cited than papers published in other journals. We also expected that international co-authorship of Slovenian researchers strongly inf1uenced the impact of scientific papers. The results obtained have not wholly confirmed the initial hypotheses. The result has been shown to be significantly inf1uenced, especially by the development of individual research fields in the country. We also compared the results/outcomes obtained through quantitative measurement and peer review of research results, and confirmed the hypothesis that by using qualitative evaluation based on international reviews with less conf1ict of interests, there is higher correlation between the two methods of measurement/evaluation.
Type (COBISS): Dissertation
Thesis comment: Univ. v Ljubljani, Filozofska fak., Oddelek za bibliotekarstvo, informacijsko znanost in knjigarstvo
Pages: XV, 178 f.
ID: 11270638