Postopek izdaje gradbenega dovoljenja

magistrsko delo

Martina Kos (Author), Janez Čebulj (Mentor)

Abstract

Z uveljavitvijo GZ leta 2018, je jasno navedeno, kdaj se bo postopek izdaje gradbenega dovoljenja vodil po skrajšanem ali posebnem ugotovitvenem postopku. V skrajšanem ugotovitvenem postopku je udeleženec postopka le investitor gradnje, medtem ko so v posebnem ugotovitvenem postopku sodelovali tudi stranski udeleženci, ki imajo izkazan pravni interes za sodelovanje, glede na dolocbe GZ. Z novim GZ je zakonodajalec želel zmanjšati investicijska tveganja in zagotoviti vecjo pravno varnost investicijske namere, saj imajo bodoci investitorji možnost pridobitve predodlocbe, s katero si zagotovijo nameravano gradnjo, brez tveganja hitrih sprememb predpisov. Namen GZ pa je bila tudi odprava težav na podrocju pridobivanja soglasij, kar je rešil s prekvalifikacijo soglasij v mnenja. Združil pa je tudi integracijo gradbenega in okoljevarstvenega dovoljenja, s cemer naj bi se racionalizirali postopki, postali ucinkovitejši, s tem absolutno krajši, cenejši in bolj ekonomicni. GZ je tudi na novo dolocil stranske udeležence, ki imajo pravni interes za sodelovanje v postopku izdaje gradbenega dovoljenja. Zakon tudi omogoca legalizacije izvedenih gradenj pred njegovo uveljavitvijo in brez ustreznih upravnih dovoljenj. Vsaka takšna sprememba zakonodaje pa lahko v prakso prinese vecjo zmedo in zaradi njene nejasnosti vodi v odlocitve, ki za stranke velikokrat niso ugodne, zato te zoper njih uporabljajo tako redna kot izredna pravna sredstva. Ali je bil namen zakonodajalca po odpravi administrativnih ovir in skrajšanju ter poenostavitvi postopka pridobivanja upravnih dovoljenj na podrocju prostora dosežen, je še prezgodaj govoriti. Ko bodo leta 2021 v veljavo stopile vse dolocbe GZ kot tudi Zakona o urejanju prostora (ZUrepP-2), bo oceno lažje podati.

Keywords

No keyword data available

Data

Language:	Slovenian
Year of publishing:	2019
Typology:	2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:	FDŠ
Publisher:	[M. Kos]
UDC:	35.077.3:351.778.511(043.2)
COBISS:	2048024804
Views:	3
Downloads:	0
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	English
Secondary abstract:	With the enforcement of the Building Act in 2018, it is clearly stated when the procedure for issuing the building permit will be conducted as a fast-track or special fact-finding procedure. In the fast-track fact-finding procedure, only the construction investor is a party to the procedure, while the special fact-finding procedure can include interveners with established legal interest for participation, based on provisions of the Building Act. With the new Building Act, the legislature wanted to reduce investment risks and ensure better legal protection of investment intent, as future investors can acquire a preliminary decision, which ensures the intended construction without the risk of rapid regulatory changes. The purpose of the Building Act was to also resolve issues in obtaining statements of consent, which it solved by reclassifying consent as opinion. It also merged the integration of the building and environmental permit, thereby rationalising procedures, making them more efficient, absolutely shorter, cheaper, and more economical. The act also re-defined interveners with legal interest for participation in the procedure for issuing a building permit. The act also allows for legalisation of constructions completed before its enforcement and without appropriate administrative permits. Any such legislative change can in practice cause major confusions and, with its lack of clarity, lead to decisions that are frequently not favourable for parties; consequently, parties use both ordinary and extraordinary legal means to appeal such decisions. It is still too early to say whether or not the purpose of the legislature to eliminate administrative obstacles and to shorten and simplify the procedure for obtaining administrative permits in spatial planning had been achieved. Once all provisions of the Building Act, as well as the Spatial Planning Act, enter into force in 2021, the assessment will be much easier.
Secondary keywords:	Upravni postopek;Magistrske naloge;Gradbeno dovoljenje;
Type (COBISS):	Master's thesis/paper
Thesis comment:	Fak. za državne in evropske študije
Source comment:	Mag. delo 2. stopnje bolonjskega študija; Nasl. z nasl. zaslona; Opis vira z dne 7. 11. 2019;
Pages:	VII, 96 str.
ID:	11278745