magistrska naloga
Gregor Marjanović (Author), Tjaša Ivanc (Mentor)

Abstract

Izvršilni postopek je sodni postopek katerega cilj je s pomočjo državne prisile opraviti izvršitev terjatev na podlagi izvršilnih naslovov in verodostojnih listin. Zakon o izvršbi in zavarovanju določa postopkovna pravila za prisilno realizacijo upnikove terjatve na podlagi verodostojne listine ali izvršilnega naslova, določa pravila za zavarovanje terjatev ter določa delovno področje in pooblastila izvršiteljev. V primeru denarnih terjatev im upnik na voljo več izvršilnih sredstev za poplačilo denarne terjatve, a pogosto je edina možnost izvršba z rubežem, cenitvijo in prodajo dolžnikovih premičnin po 83. členu ZIZ. Ker so dolžniki pogosto (pre)zadolženi, ostali upniki pa so že posegli po drugem premoženju dolžnika, upniku v želji, da bi prišel do (hitrejšega) poplačila ne ostane drugega, da poseže na premično premoženje dolžnika. Če se upnik odloči za izvršbo na premičnine gre za izvršilno sredstvo pri katerem je potrebno opraviti neposredna dejanja izvršbe in določiti izvršitelja, ki bo poskušal doseči plačilo dolga. Področje izvršiteljev je bilo s sprejetjem ZIZ leta 1998 bistveno spremenjeno z uvedbo instituta zasebnega izvršitelja po vzoru francoske in nizozemske ureditve. Izvršitelji delujejo na podlagi podeljene koncesije s strani ministrstva za pravosodje, na podlagi izpolnjenih pogojev za opravljenje službe. Ministrstvo za pravosodje njihovo delo nadzira, kljub temu, da je opravljanje dela priznano kot svoboden, samostojen poklic. S spremembo in prenos službe izvršitelja v zasebno sfero je prišlo do razbremenitve dela sodišč tako z organizacijskega kot finančnega vidika, a praksa kaže, da se kljub temu soočajo z velikimi obremenitvami. Trenutno je v Republiki Sloveniji po podatkih Zbornice izvršiteljev Slovenije 32 izvršiteljev, ki so skupaj v letu 2018 imeli v upravljanju 117.163 izvršilnih zadev. Namen magistrske naloge je obravnava in potrditev ključne vloge izvršitelja pri opravljanju neposrednih dejanj izvršbe v primeru izterjave denarnih terjatev in pri izvrševanju sodnih odločb v družinskopravnih sporih. V ta namen se opredelijo pristojnosti izvršitelja po Zakonu o izvršbi in zavarovanju in pogled sodne prakse na njihovo delo. V povezavi s delom izvršitelja se predstavi nadzor nad njegovim delom, poslovanje ter odškodninska in disciplinska odgovornost. Z namenom oceniti trenutni položaj izvršiteljev v Republiki Sloveniji se primerjalnopravno predstavi sistem izvršiteljev v Združenem kraljestvu ter poda predloge za učinkovitejšo realizacijo v premičninskih izvršbah, upoštevajoč temeljne ustavne garancije.

Keywords

izvršitelj;zakon o izvršbi in zavarovanju;izvršba;rubež premičnin;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization: UM PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher: G. Marjanović]
UDC: 347.9(043.3)
COBISS: 5831723 Link will open in a new window
Views: 882
Downloads: 132
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: The role of bailiffs in slovenia and comparative law examples
Secondary abstract: Enforcement procedure is a judicial procedure which aims to enforce claims based on enforcement titles and other law acknowledged documents by means of State coercion. Claim Enforcement and Security Act lays down basic procedural rules in enforcement procedures, sets out rules regarding claim security and defines the scope and powers of enforcement agents, also known as bailiffs. In case of monetary claims the creditor has different means of enforcement to choose from, but often the only option to achieve debt repayment is execution of debtor's goods and movable property under Article 83 of Claim Enforcement and Security Act, due to debtors often overindebtedness and the fact his other assets, such as his salary or funds on bank accounts are most likely to already have been encroached by other creditors. Execution on debtors movable property requires direct enforcement actions by enforcemnt agent with the sole objective to obtain debt repayment. With the adoption of Claim Enforcement and Security Act in 1998 the field of bailiffs was significantly altered with the enactment of private enforcement agents which operate on a concession awarded by the Ministry of Justice which also sets up rules and conditions for their service and oversees their work, despite they are recognised as a freelance profession. The alternation from public to private sphere has led to reduction of court workload, both from organizational and financial point of view, but practice show they nevertheless face considerable burdens. Currently, according to Slovenian Ministry of Justice there are 32 enforcement agents who alone had 117.163 court judgement cases under management. The main purpose of this master thesis is to discuss and determine the key role of enforcement agent in the enforcement procedure of monetary claims and in enforcement of court decisions in family law disputes and introduce their power under Claim Enforcement and Security Act and case law view of their work. For a clearer view of assessing the current situation of enforcement agents in Slovenia, a system of bailiffs in United Kingdom is presented, specifically England and Wales with the purpose of finding proposals for a more effective enforcement of movable goods, taking into account fundamental constitutional guarantees.
Secondary keywords: enforcement agent;bailiff;Claim Enforcement and Security Act;enforcement;enforcement of goods;
Type (COBISS): Master's thesis/paper
Thesis comment: Univ. v Mariboru, Pravna fak.
Pages: 53 f.
ID: 11341691