(magistrsko diplomsko delo)
Maks David Osojnik (Author), Vasilka Sancin (Mentor)

Abstract

Predmet magistrskega diplomskega dela je analiza pravnega varstva pred nezakonito razlastitvijo, ki poskuša vzpostaviti ravnotežje med pravicami investitorjev in pravicami držav gostiteljic, kar tvori jedro mednarodnega investicijskega prava. K vprašanju, kako postaviti mejo med ukrepi države gostiteljice, ki pomenijo razlastitev tuje investicije, in ukrepi, ki pomenijo zakonito regulacijo, so tribunali v mednarodni investicijski arbitraži pristopili z dvema doktrinama: doktrino uči nkov in doktrino oblastnih pristojnosti. Doktrina učinkov pravi, da je edini dejavnik pri ugotavljanju, ali je prišlo do posredne razlastitve, učinek ukrepov države na določeno premoženje. Namen, ki ga ti ukrepi zasledujejo, je povsem nerelevanten. Na drugi strani doktrina oblastnih pristojnosti kot relevantne kriterije upošteva tudi namen, kontekst in naravo spornih ukrepov. Če ukrep zasleduje legitimne cilje javnega dobra, je nediskriminatoren, sprejet v dobri veri in razumen, potem do razlastitve ni prišlo. Zaradi pomanjkljivosti obeh doktrin se je razvila omiljena oblika doktrine oblastnih pristojnosti, ki je omejena na nekatere najpomembnejše elemente javne dobrobiti, kot so javno zdravje, varnost, okolje in davčna politika. Doktrina je bila v svoji omiljeni obliki vključena v številne novejše mednarodne investicijske sporazume. Magistrsko diplomsko delo obravnava tudi vse pogostejšo prakso arbitražnih investicijskih tribunalov, ki pri presoji zakonitega izvrševanja oblastnih pristojnosti uporabijo test sorazmernosti. Hipoteza tega magistrskega diplomskega dela je, da je pri presoji domnevne posredne razlastitve treba upoštevati tudi namen spornega ukrepa in da je doktrina oblastnih pristojnosti omejena zgolj na nekatere ukrepe, ki zadevajo najpomembnejše javne interese.

Keywords

mednarodno pravo;mednarodno investicijsko pravo;mednarodna investicijska arbitraža;doktrina oblastnih pristojnosti;doktrina učinkov;magistrske diplomske naloge;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization: UL PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher: [M. D. Osojnik]
UDC: 341:330.322(043.2)
COBISS: 17096273 Link will open in a new window
Views: 819
Downloads: 236
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: Police powers doctrine in international investment law
Secondary abstract: Subject of the master’s thesis is the analysis of protection from illegal expropriation; which seeks the balance between rights of foreign investors and rights of host states, and forms the core of international investment law. To answer a question how to draw a line between measures adopted by the host states that constitute expropriation of a foreign investment and measures that are legitimate regulation, the tribunals in international investment arbitration adopted two doctrines; the sole-effects doctrine and the police powers doctrine. The sole-effects doctrine states that the only factor in establishing whether an indirect expropriation occurred is the effect of the state measures on the affected property. Purpose of these measures is irrelevant in this determination. On the other hand, the doctrine of police powers considers as relevant criteria the purpose, context and nature of the contested measures. If the measure pursues legitimate public welfare objectives, is non-discriminatory, adopted in good faith and is reasonable, then there was no expropriation. Due to the shortcomings of both doctrines, a mitigated police powers doctrine has been developed, which limits it to some most relevant aspects of public welfare, such as; public health, safety, environment and tax measures. The doctrine in its mitigated form has been included in several new international investment treaties. The master thesis also touches upon the increasing practice of arbitral tribunals to use the test of proportionality in adjudication of legality of the exercise of police powers. The hypothesis of this master’s thesis is that when adjudicating a claim for an alleged indirect expropriation the purpose of the measure must be considered and that the doctrine of police powers is limited to certain measures that pertain to most relevant public welfare objectives.
Secondary keywords: international investment law;investment arbitration;international investment arbitration;police powers doctrine;sole-effects doctrine;
Type (COBISS): Master's thesis/paper
Study programme: 0
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE): 1970-01-01
Thesis comment: Univ. v Ljubljani, Pravna fak.
Pages: VII, 46 f.
ID: 11353462