Uporaba univerzalnih norm na regionalni ravni

primerjalna študija univerzalnega in režima Evropske unije za zaščito beguncev

Andrea Stanišić (Author), Marko Lovec (Mentor)

Abstract

Vse bolj restriktivne težnje režima za zaščito beguncev, ki se razvija v Evropski uniji (EU) in ki se nanaša na Konvencijo o statusu beguncev iz leta 1951 (Konvencija 1951) in na Protokol o statusu beguncev iz leta 1967 (1967 Protokol) ter na temelje univerzalnega režima za zaščito beguncev dandanes vzbuja veliko zaskrbljenosti. V poskusu naslavljanja možnega nasprotovanja med univerzalnimi normami in njihovim izvajanjem na regionalni ravni magistrska naloga omogoča primerjalno analizo normativov ter drugih elementov teh dveh režimov za zaščito beguncev. Na ta način delo naslavlja raziskovalno vprašanje, v kolikšni meri je EU sledila univerzalnim načelom in normam za zaščito beguncev, ter posledično misel o kakovosti zaščite beguncev na ravni EU. V teoretičnem okviru mednarodnih režimov in drugih ustreznih teorij ter z omembo posebnih družbenih, političnih in gospodarskih okoliščin primerjalna analiza obeh režimov razkriva v kolikšni meri je EU upoštevala univerzalne norme, tako, da prikazuje, da čeprav se režim EU za zaščito beguncev zaupa istim temeljnim normam kot univerzalni režim za zaščito beguncev in jih celo razširja ter uvaja tudi številna pravila in standarde, ki omejujejo stopnjo in kakovost zaščite beguncev v EU in s tem ogrožajo temeljne norme. Ta nasprotovanja znotraj samega režima EU še bolj razkrivajo šibkost režima, pa tudi nasprotujoče značilnosti njegovega odnosa do univerzalnega režima za zaščito beguncev.

Keywords

international regimes;international norms for refugee protection;the universal and European Union regimes for refugee protection;international regimes theories;Begunci;Mednarodno pravo;Magistrska dela;

Data

Language:	English
Year of publishing:	2019
Typology:	2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization:	UL FDV - Faculty of Social Sciences
Publisher:	[A. Stanišić]
UDC:	341.43:061.1EU(043.2)
COBISS:	36571229
Views:	679
Downloads:	211
Average score:	0 (0 votes)
Metadata:

Other data

Secondary language:	Slovenian
Secondary title:	Application of the universal norms at the regional level
Secondary abstract:	Concerns are raised about the increasingly restrictive tendencies of the regime for refugee protection that has been developing in the European Union (EU), which relies on the 1951 Convention relating to the Status of Refugees (1951 Convention) and the 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees (1967 Protocol), as the foundations of the universal regime for refugee protection. In the attempt to address a possible contradiction between the universal norms and their implementation at the regional level, the thesis provides a comparative analysis of norms, but also of other elements of the two regimes for refugee protection, and in that way addresses its research question about the extent to which the EU followed universal principles and norms for refugee protection and its consequential reflection in the quality of refugees protection at the EU level. Within a theoretical framework of international regimes and other relevant theories, and with a reference to specific social, political and economic circumstances, the comparative analysis of both regimes reveals the extent to which the EU has followed universal norms, by showing that although the EU regime for refugee protection relies on the same fundamental norms as the universal regime for refugee protection, and even expands them, it also introduces a number of elements that limit degree and quality of refugee protection in the EU, and thereby endanger the foundational norms. These contradictories within the EU regime itself, further reveal the weakness of the regime, but also contradictory characteristics of its relationship with the universal regime.
Secondary keywords:	mednarodni režimi;mednarodne norme za zaščito beguncev;univerzalni in režim EU za zaščito beguncev;teorije mednarodnih režimov;Refugees;International law;Master's theses;
Type (COBISS):	Master's thesis/paper
Study programme:	0
Thesis comment:	Univ. v Ljubljani, Fak. za družbene vede
Pages:	115 str.
ID:	11367628