(magistrsko diplomsko delo)
Luka Gartner (Author), Tilen Štajnpihler (Mentor)

Abstract

V magistrskem delu se ukvarjam z vprašanjem, ali prihaja do zlorab skrajšanega in nujnega zakonodajnega postopka v Republiki Sloveniji. Izhodiščna teza dela je, da je raba obeh posebnih oblik zakonodajnega postopka nedvomno prepogosta, saj sta v zadnjih letih celo začeli izpodrivati rabo rednega zakonodajnega postopka, ki je v Poslovniku Državnega zbora postavljen kot pravilo. Glavno vprašanje, ki se postavlja, pa je, ali je povečana raba skrajšanega in nujnega postopka povezana tudi z njuno zlorabo. V magistrskem delu podajam svojo definicijo pojma zlorabe skrajšanega in nujnega zakonodajnega postopka ter poskušam najti tudi primere sprejetih zakonov, ki bi ustrezali podani delovni definiciji. Temu sledijo še sklepne ugotovitve, v katerih povzamem opravljeno delo in poskušam odgovoriti na vprašanje o razširjenosti zlorab skrajšanega in nujnega zakonodajnega postopka v praksi Državnega zbora Republike Slovenije.

Keywords

nujni zakonodajni postopek;skrajšani zakonodajni postopek;zloraba;primeri tipov zlorab;magistrske diplomske naloge;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 2.09 - Master's Thesis
Organization: UL PF - Faculty of Law
Publisher: [L. Gartner]
UDC: 342(043.2)
COBISS: 17372241 Link will open in a new window
Views: 731
Downloads: 215
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: (Ab)use of quickened and urgent legislative procedure in the Republic of Slovenia
Secondary abstract: In my master's thesis I put forward a question if there are two extraordinary forms of legislative procedure being abused in the Republic of Slovenia. The main thesis of the master's thesis is that the use of both extraordinary types is undoubtedly too common because in recent years they started to eclipse the use of ordinary legislative procedure, which is a type of procedure that should be used on the regular basis, according to the Poslovnik Državnega zbora. The main question therefore is, does the increase in use of both extraordinary types also mean that they are being abused. In the master's thesis I put forward my definition of the term »abuse of urgent and quickened legislative procedure« and try to find real life examples of passed laws that would fall within the frame of my definition. The core part of the master's thesis is concluded with my findings in which I summarize the main points of the master's thesis and try to answer the question about the frequency of occurrence of abuse in urgent and quickened legislative procedures in the Slovenian parliament.
Secondary keywords: urgent legislative procedure;quickened legislative procedure;abuse;examples of types of abuse;
Type (COBISS): Master's thesis/paper
Study programme: 0
Embargo end date (OpenAIRE): 1970-01-01
Thesis comment: Univ. v Ljubljani, Pravna fak.
Pages: 40 f.
ID: 11398738