Manca Stanković (Author), Darija Šćepanović (Author), Miroljub Jakovljević (Author)

Abstract

Uvod: Če povečana laksnost ligamentov v nosečnosti ni kompenzirana s spremenjenim nevromotoričnim nadzorom, lahko pride do bolečine v medenici, ki jo lahko ocenjujemo z barvno vidno analogno lestvico (angl. Colour Visual Analogue Scale – CVAS) ali/in testom aktivnega dviga stegnjene noge (Active Straight Leg Raise – ASLR). Metode: V raziskavo je bilo vključenih 60 nosečnic, ki so bile v 12. tednu nosečnosti ali več. Z omenjenima testoma smo ocenjevali bolečino v medeničnem obroču med nosečnostjo. Vsako ocenjevanje smo opravili dvakrat. Rezultati: Pearsonov korelacijski koeficient je pokazal dobro povezanost med CVAS in ASLR tako prve (r = 0,755) kot tudi druge meritve (r = 0,808). Razlika med prvo in drugo oceno s CVAS je bila pomembna (p = 0,03), nasprotno pa med prvo in drugo meritvijo z ASLR ni bilo pomembnih razlik. Ugotovljena je bila visoka ponovljivost ASLR (IKK = 0,96). Zaključki: ASLR-test je veljaven, zanesljiv in občutljiv in pomeni močno konkurenco vsem drugim kliničnim testom za oceno bolečine v medeničnem obroču pri nosečnicah.

Keywords

bolečina v medeničnem obroču;nosečnost;ocenjevanje bolečine;lestvice;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 1.01 - Original Scientific Article
Organization: UL ZF - University College of Health Studies
UDC: 615.82/.84-055.26:616-009.7
COBISS: 4695659 Link will open in a new window
ISSN: 1318-2102
Views: 474
Downloads: 169
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: Repeatability and correlation of Active Straight Leg Raise and Colour Visual Analogue Scale in pregnant women
Secondary abstract: Introduction: If increased laxity of ligaments during pregnancy is not compensated with changed neuro-motor control, this may lead to pelvic girdle pain, which we can assess with Colour Visual Analogue Scale (CVAS) and Active Straight Leg Raise (ASLR) test. Methods: Sixty expectant mothers were included who were twelve or more weeks pregnant. The pelvic girdle pain was assessed with the mentioned two tests. Each assessment was repeated twice. Results: Pearson’s correlation coefficient showed good correlation between the CVAS and ASLR test in the first (r = 0.755) as well as the second measurement (r = 0.808). The difference between the first and the second measurement with CVAS were significant (p = 0.03), while there were no significant differences between the first and the second measurement with the ASLR test. ASLR test also showed high repeatability (ICC=0.96). Conclusions: The ASLR test is valid, reliable and sensitive enough and presents a strong competition to all other clinical tests for the pelvic girdle pain assessment in pregnant women.
Secondary keywords: pelvic girdle pain;pregnancy;pain assessment;scales;
URN: URN:NBN:SI
Pages: str. 1-6
Volume: ǂLetn. ǂ22
Issue: ǂšt. ǂ1
Chronology: apr. 2014
ID: 11427501