Urška Puh (Author)

Abstract

Uvod: Test hoje na 10 m se pogosto uporablja za ocenjevanje hitrosti hoje pri različnih skupinah preiskovancev, vendar so načini izvedbe testa različni. Namen pregleda literature je bil ugotoviti najpogostejše izvedbe testa hoje na 10 m pri starejših in pacientih z nevrološkimi okvarami ter ugotoviti, ali imajo potrjeno veljavnost in zanesljivost. Metode: Po ključnih besedah, povezanih z namenom pregleda, smo iskali članke v podatkovni zbirki PubMed. Iskanje je bilo omejeno na angleški jezik. Rezultati: V analizo je bilo vključenih 23 raziskovalnih člankov. Celotna dolžina proge 14 m je bila uporabljena v 14 raziskavah in celotna dolžina proge 10 m v 7 raziskavah. V 10 raziskavah so testirali le sproščeno hojo in v prav toliko raziskavah sproščeno in hitro hojo. O veljavnosti testa so poročali v 11 raziskavah. Zanesljivost najpogostejših načinov izvedbe testa je dobra (ICC = 0,82–0,99). Zaključki: Predlagamo, da se test izvede za sproščeno in hitro hojo. Za vsako hitrost naj hodi preiskovanec v treh ponovitvah po progi, dolgi 14 m, meri pa se čas v osrednjih 10 m. Rezultata sta hitrosti (m/s), izračunani iz povprečja meritev.

Keywords

test hoje;hitrost hoje;veljavnost;zanesljivost;kvantitativna ocena hoje;fizioterapija;

Data

Language: Slovenian
Year of publishing:
Typology: 1.02 - Review Article
Organization: UL ZF - University College of Health Studies
UDC: 615.8:796.421
COBISS: 4696427 Link will open in a new window
ISSN: 1318-2102
Views: 697
Downloads: 237
Average score: 0 (0 votes)
Metadata: JSON JSON-RDF JSON-LD TURTLE N-TRIPLES XML RDFA MICRODATA DC-XML DC-RDF RDF

Other data

Secondary language: English
Secondary title: 10 meter walk test
Secondary abstract: Background: 10 meter walk test is frequently used for walking speed assessment in different participant groups; however test methodology differs. The purpose of the literature review was to establish the most common protocols of the 10 meter walk test in elderly and neurological patients, and to establish if their validity and reliability were assessed. Methods: PubMed database was searched for articles using terms related to the review purpose. The search was limited to English language. Results: 23 research papers were analysed. 14 m walking path was used in 14 studies, and 10 m walking path in 7 studies. Test of comfortable pace was performed in 10 studies, and test of comfortable and fast pace in other 10 studies. Validity was reported in 11 studies. Reliability of the most common test protocols is good (ICC = 0.82 – 0.99). Conclusion: It is recommended to perform the test at comfortable and fast walking pace. With each pace a subject walks on 14 m walking path in three repetitions, and time is measured over central 10 m. The results are speeds (m/s) calculated from the measurements’ average.
Secondary keywords: walk test;walking speed;validity;reliability;quantitative gait assessment;physiotherapy;
URN: URN:NBN:SI
Pages: str. 45-54
Volume: ǂLetn. ǂ22
Issue: ǂšt. ǂ1
Chronology: apr. 2014
ID: 11427507